A detection of that sinnful, shamful, lying, and ridiculous discours, of Samuel Harshnet. entituled: A discouerie of the fravvdulent practises of Iohn Darrell wherein is manifestly and apparantly shewed in the eyes of the world. not only the vnlikelihoode, but the flate impossibilitie of the pretended counterfayting of William Somers, Thomas Darling, Kath. Wright, and Mary Couper, togeather with the other 7. in Lancashire, and the supposed teaching of them by the saide Iohn Darrell.

About this Item

Title
A detection of that sinnful, shamful, lying, and ridiculous discours, of Samuel Harshnet. entituled: A discouerie of the fravvdulent practises of Iohn Darrell wherein is manifestly and apparantly shewed in the eyes of the world. not only the vnlikelihoode, but the flate impossibilitie of the pretended counterfayting of William Somers, Thomas Darling, Kath. Wright, and Mary Couper, togeather with the other 7. in Lancashire, and the supposed teaching of them by the saide Iohn Darrell.
Author
Darrel, John, b. ca. 1562.
Publication
[England?] :: Imprinted [by the English secret press?],
1600.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Harsnett, Samuel, -- 1561-1631. -- Discovery of the fraudulent practises of John Darrel -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Demonic possession -- Early works to 1800.
Exorcism -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"A detection of that sinnful, shamful, lying, and ridiculous discours, of Samuel Harshnet. entituled: A discouerie of the fravvdulent practises of Iohn Darrell wherein is manifestly and apparantly shewed in the eyes of the world. not only the vnlikelihoode, but the flate impossibilitie of the pretended counterfayting of William Somers, Thomas Darling, Kath. Wright, and Mary Couper, togeather with the other 7. in Lancashire, and the supposed teaching of them by the saide Iohn Darrell." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19855.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 15, 2024.

Pages

Darrell.

It is very true that is said here of a fit that So. had before cer∣taine weomen, and is as true that the same day or day before he had an other in the garden before M. Freeman and some other: vpon the sight whereof, because of his greuous beating of himself, with his face groueling and tongue thrust into the moulds, wallowing, & foming, he the said M. Freeman affirmed, that he had the falling sicknesse, and this was presently bruited throughout Nottingham. If So. were weary of his relapse or pretending to be repossssed. that is of counterfeyting, & said vnto Cooper, that his desire was to be at S. Ioanes, and that so at the lngth he might be quiet an giue ouer his counterfeyting, as is said in this very page, and in the leae before why did he fall to the doinge of his tricks againe after he was at S. Ioanes? It is absurd to say that

Page 122

he did thus, because the weomen did bemone him for the weomen being remoued or as Cooper deposeth page 193. put ut of the house, and so de¦parted, he was stll at his tricks: It cannot therefore be that he did at this time his tricks because of the eomen: neither becaus be thought men tooke some pleasure to behold him, and for that cause himself in the atige of them. Neither can it be that Shepheard and Cooper did threaē him, that the weomē or any other might see, that they could make him leaue his tricks, and all his knauery: seeinge the weomen were gone home, and they two alone with Som. in his fit, when they did threaten him. Moreouor, it is confessed that So. at Sm Ioanes in a fit, being threatned by Coper to be whipped, and by Shepheard to be pin¦ched with a paire of knipknaps, did therevpon presently leaue his tricks, and had no more fits, whilest he was at S. Ioanes: It cannot therefore be that So. left his counterfyting, because he grew (a) weary thereof, and did of himselfe goe to S. Ioanes to be (a) quyet, and that he confessed so∣much to Cooper before he came to S. Ioanes, as the Disc. affirmeth page 152. and 178. And this is the 11. time the Discouerer is conuinced by his Discouery.

VVe are besides to obserue heere, first that this confession of counterfeyting was got, by one Nich. Shepheard, and Iohn Cooper two very dissolute and infamous men. I remember in a certificate made by one of Nott. to the Arch-bishop of York, wherevnto many of the chief of Nott. subscribed, there were these wordes vsed concerninge these honest men, that tey were twoo rakshames, the better of them hauing bene twise (o) araigned. 2. that these were fit instrumentes for Sathan to worke by, 3. that Som. confession of counterfeytinge was not voluntary, but extorted & by threats compassed.

Notes

  • pag. 19. See then good reader 〈◊〉〈◊〉 this Diso crosieth & entangleth him∣selfe for yf this ••••pposed coun∣trfeyt. did giue oue his trickes: for theates o∣feare, how then did he grow we ar of them, or did volunta••••ly reue himselfe to be quiet.

  • o

    and yet 〈◊〉〈◊〉 good u∣ough against Darrell.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.