The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright.

About this Item

Title
The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright.
Author
Wright, Henry, fl. 1616.
Publication
London :: Printed by Nicholas Okes,
1616.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Political science -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15753.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 7, 2024.

Pages

9

It may further bee demanded, wherefore all credit, countenance, honors, and authority in Court, are for the most part slippery, and not to be trusted vnto?

HAppeneth it thus by reason of the Fates vn∣certainty (as it pleaseth the r Historian to set

Page 20

downe) who auerreth, that Court-fauours, euen by decree of the destinies, are not alwaies lasting? Or might this rather be the reason, for that s Cour∣tiers credites are (commonly) vpheld by others, and not by their owne strengths? Or not so nei∣ther, but for that these things thus fall out through the fault of the Princes, their Maisters, whom they serue, whose wils and pleasures as they are t vehement for the time, so they are very changeable, and oftentimes contrary to them∣selues?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.