Sect. 2.
Here first he undertakes to set down the cause of Sense, as if it had but one (as indeed, by his Philosophy, it might seem to have) this cause he makes to be the ex∣ternal object, which presseth the Organ, proper to each sense, &c. this pressure he followes to the brain and heart, (I wonder which way from the eye, or ear, it gets to the heart,) there this pressure caused a resistance, or counter-passion, or endeavour of the heart to deliver it self, (mark now, the brain, which doubtless is the foun∣tain of sense, is left out) which endeavour, because out∣ward, seemeth to be some matter without; consider the strange uncouthness of this language; if there be such an endeavour which universally cannot be true, yet this endeavour is inward, although that which presseth it be put out; like a man who thrusteth another out of doors, that endeavour to thrust him out is within, although the man be thrust out, all his endeavour must be within, un∣less he follow him out of doors, which I think he will not affirm of the brain, or heart. Secondly, consider that it is impossible that the heart, or brain, should be so displeased with all apparitions, although they press them, as to endeavour to be delivered of them; for there are some things of this nature, as sweet Musick, Tast, Beauties in visible objects, in all senses some ob∣jects so grateful to the Organ, yea, heart, or brain, yea all, that they cannot chuse but delight in them, yea hug and embrace them with all kindness; if so, why should they endeavour to expell them? yes, (he may say) be∣cause