Page 3266
CHAP. XLIX.
That The Forraigne mainteiners of the more then Fatal Irrespective Rigid Decree make Christ Iesus rather a meere Sacrifice Then a True Everlasting Priest acting for us, and daily working out our Reconciliation to God. So do such as teach [That The Sinnes of some were Remitted before they were Commit∣ted.] Of the Super-Excellency of Christs Priesthood and one Sacrifice in comparison of The Aaronical Pr. and the many Services thereof.
1. BUt here I must expect this or the like Reply from some Interimists or such peaceable men as desire a reconciliation betwixt Ours and the Romish Church:
If to celebrate the Sacrifice of the Mass, that is, So to offer up Christs body and Blood or whole Christ upon the Altar, be a branch of Antichristianism or an implicit denyal of Christs Everlast∣ing Priesthood: will you undertake to acquit the reformed Churches (as you term them) from the like sin or Sacrilegious opinions, or from rob∣bing Christ of his Greatest Honours as He is Man, which are, to be King, Priest, and Judge?For any intire Reformed Churches or Christian Sove∣raigntie, whose Publick Confessions or authorized Catechismes it hath been my hap to Read, I know not one that is this way faulty: Nor do the bitterest adversaries of the Gallican, Swizterland, or German Churches lay Antichristi∣anism to the charge of their autorized Canons or Constitutions, Albeit they indict a great number of private writers, Pastors or Teachers in Germanie, France, & Switzerland, many in England and more in Scotland for being de∣voted Members of the Eastern Antichrist; the height of whose Haeresie or Infidelitie, they place in the Maintenance of That more then Fatal irrespective Decree, in respect of Which all things (Christs death it self not excepted) be said, so to fall out, as that they could not fall out otherwise or be prevented.
2. For such private writers as have gone too far in the Poynts mentioned, in what Christian Church soever they be, I leave them to answer for themselves and for those whose doctrin they Follow. My purpose is onely to request my Brethren of the Church of England (however for the present they stand affected in these poynts) to take it into more deep and Logical Considera∣tion then hitherto it hath been taken by English Preachers or Writers;
Whether, According to Forrain Rigid Tenets of Predestination, or of Gods absolute irrespective Decree for Election and Reprobation, (which came to us English at the third hand, as from Zwinglius &c. which They had at the first, from some antient Romish Schoolemen,) it be possible for us or them to maintain by any rational way; That our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ either now is, or hath been a true Priest or Sacrificer, rather then a meer Sacrifice predestinated from eternitie for takeing away the sinnes of the Elect onely? Or whether such, as They Term Elect from Eternitie, needed any Priest at all besides God the Father who did destinate his Onely Son to be a Sacrifice or a mean necessary (though subordinate) for effecting