An exact collection of the works of Doctor Jackson ... such as were not published before : Christ exercising his everlasting priesthood ... or, a treatise of that knowledge of Christ which consists in the true estimate or experimental valuation of his death, resurrection, and exercise of his everlasting sacerdotal function ... : this estimate cannot rightly be made without a right understanding of the primeval state of Adam ...

About this Item

Title
An exact collection of the works of Doctor Jackson ... such as were not published before : Christ exercising his everlasting priesthood ... or, a treatise of that knowledge of Christ which consists in the true estimate or experimental valuation of his death, resurrection, and exercise of his everlasting sacerdotal function ... : this estimate cannot rightly be made without a right understanding of the primeval state of Adam ...
Author
Jackson, Thomas, 1579-1640.
Publication
London :: Printed by R. Norton for Timothie Garthwait ...,
1654.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Apostles' Creed -- Early works to 1800.
Theology, Doctrinal.
Cite this Item
"An exact collection of the works of Doctor Jackson ... such as were not published before : Christ exercising his everlasting priesthood ... or, a treatise of that knowledge of Christ which consists in the true estimate or experimental valuation of his death, resurrection, and exercise of his everlasting sacerdotal function ... : this estimate cannot rightly be made without a right understanding of the primeval state of Adam ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A46995.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 16, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. XLVIII.
The Parallel between the most Solemn Services of the Law and The One Sacrifice of Christ. And, The high praeeminence and efficacie of This in comparison of Those. The Romanists Doctrin [that in the Masse Christs Body is Iden∣tically Carnally present, and that there is a proper Sacrifice Propitiatorie offered] derogates from the Absolute Per∣fection of Christs offering himself Once for all.

1. THe principal Termes of proportion in this Parallel which serve as so many several Kens or Markes for the right survaying of it, are The services of the Law, or the Offices of Legal Priests, and the Perpetual Function of our High Priest. The services of the Law wherein our Apostle instanceth, are the Principal and most Solemn Sacrifices, which were injoyned to the Priests after the order of Aaron. The One Sort whereof were Anniversaries, as of Bullockes and Goates▪ and to be offered every year upon the day of Attonement, and so to be offered from the First Erection of the Taber∣nacle in the wilderness, so long as the Law of Ceremonies was de Jure to con∣tinue, untill our Saviours death upon the Cross; since which time all Bloody Sacrifice have lost their Legal Vse. The Other service was That Sacrifice of the Red Heifer, and the Consecration of water by the sprinkling or mingling her Ashes; which perhaps was not Anniversarie, nor often put in practice from the time of Moses his Death untill the Ascension of our Saviour into heaven.

Page 3262

Now our Apostle takes it as granted, that if these choice Sacrifices, of Atton∣ment, and of the Red Cow, were altogether unsufficient to purifie the Hearts and Consciences, or the Soules and Spirits of sinful men; the Ordinary or meaner sacrifices of the Law were much more unsufficient to all such pur∣poses as the Sacrifices of our high Priest was Alsufficient to all such pur∣poses as the Sacrifice of our high Priest was Alsufficient and most Efficacious for. The Eminency of Christs bloudie Sacrifice upon the Cross (in respect of all Legal sacrifices of what rank soever) consisteth, First, in the Efficacy which it had and hath for Remission of all sins committed against the Moral Law of God; that is, of all such sins as immediately pollute the reasonable Soul and Conscience. The least degree of such Purification no Legal Sacrifices could immediatly effect, reach, or touch. To what Use then did they di∣rectly serve? or what was the proper Effect unto which they were immedi∣ately terminated? That was the Purification of mens Bodyes from meere Legal uncleannesse; that is, from all such negligences, Ignorances, or Casu∣al Occurrences as not being expiated by the Priest, did exclude the parties so offending from the Tabernacle of the Congregation; Or (as our Apostle speakes) to Purifie them from such uncleannesses of the flesh, as did but fore∣shadow or picture the uncleanness of the soul, or the dead works of sinne, All which, being not expiated by a more excellent Priest then any was after the order of Aaron▪ will exclude all from entring into the heavenly Tabernacle.

2. Such Legal uncleannesse, as did exclude the Parties polluted with it from the Tabernacle of the Congregation, was many waies contracted; as by touching of the dead; by eating of Meats forbidden by the Law; or by not eating meates allowed of by the Law according to the Rule or Prescript for such Ceremonial Services; or by the like Omissions or Practises which were not in their own nature or to all men sinful, but sinful in the Seed of Jacob only, to whom they were Evill only because forbidden, not forbidden because they were evill in their own nature. Even in regard of such shadows or Typical Of∣fices for Purifying men Legally unclean, the best and most solemn Sacri∣fices of the Law (though offered once at least every year, and otherwise as often as dayly Occasions or Occurrences did require) were no way so efficaci∣ous or Effectual, as the One Sacrifice of the Son of God offered by himself but Once for all, is for the perpetual Purifying of our Soules from the Dead works of sin, and for our Consecration to the everlasting service of the everli∣ving God, which is that Freedom indeed wherewith his only Son hath promi∣sed to set all such Free, as Believe in his Name and Abide in his word, John 8.

3. The Eminencie of Christs Priesthood and Sacrifice, above the Priest∣hood and Services of the Law is deeply wronged by the Doctrine and Pra∣ctise of Secular and Regular Roman-Catholick Priests, as they do term themselves; and so is our Apostles Doctrine in the ninth and tenth Chapters to the Hebrews, more peremptorily contradicted by them, then it was by the Incredulous or unbelieving Jews, in his life time. The Western Anti-Christ (so the Lutherans distinguish them) hath in this particular so farr out∣bid the Antichrist of the East, that if 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, that Law-opposer or man of sin, were to be followed close with Howant-Cry, or his Footsteps to be tra∣ced for these nine hundred years, by the Christian Kingdoms or States, the Chase and Cry would sooner fall into Rome or Trent then into Constantinople; though That, no question, be now the seat of Gog and Magog or of the Eastern Antichrist. That Contradiction of Sinners, which our Saviour Christ did indure here on Earth, Heb. 12. 3. improved by the Roman Church in later dayes, a∣gainst all such as rightly believe in him, specially against such as duly admi∣nister

Page 3263

his holy Sacraments, may with its improvement be concludently in∣ferred by the Tenents and daily Practises of that Church, both which are as punctually and as fully contradictory to the Doctrine of the Author of this Epistle, Chap. 9. and 10. and to many other principal Maxims of Christian Religion, as any Doctrine, Tenent, or Practise can be one to another. For the Law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those Sacrifices which they offered year by year continually to make the Comers thereunto perfect. For then would they not have ceased to be of∣fered, because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of Sins. But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sinnes every year. For it is not possible that the bloud of Bulls and Goates should take away sins, &c. Heb. 10. 1, 2, 3, 4. By the which we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ ONCE FOR ALL. And every Priest standeth daily mini∣string and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices which can never take away sinnes. But this man (or rather this Priest) after he had offered ONE SACRIFICE for sinnes for ever, sat don on the right hand of God, from henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified. Whereof the holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before, this is the Covenant that will make with them after those dayes, saith the Lord: I will put my Laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them: and their sinnes and iniquities will I remember no more. Now where Remission of these is, there is no more offering for Sin, ver. 10. to 18.

4. The force of our Apostles Inference, and the very Pith of his Discourse throughout these Passages, presented to the Readers View, doth more pun∣ctually refute the Doctrine of the Romish Masse, then it did the Contradicting, Jews, or other Blasphemers of Christs Name and Office, either before or since this Divine Epistle was written. The Pith and Marrow of all his Argu∣ments consists in This; That even the best of Legal Sacrifices or services (were they bloudy or unbloudy) were altogether Unsufficient to Purifie the Con∣science, could never take away sin; Because They were to be Reiterated, the best and most solemn of them every Year, and many of them every Day, others as oft as Casual Occasions did require Now if this Argument be Con∣cludent (as no Christian can denie it to be) against the Jews which pleaded for the Sufficiencie of Legal Sacrifices, it will conclude a fortiori, or with a 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Heb 9. 14. against the absolute Perfection or Sufficiencie of our Saviours Sacrifice of Himself (supposing that it should be as the Romanists teach.) Thus much it will inevitably inferre, according to the Peremptory Canons of the Roman Church, which plainly teach, and under pain of damnation injoyn all Christians to believe, that Christs Body and Bloud That very same Body, that very same bloud which were once offered by himself upon the Crosse, are daily offered by the Masle-Priest. Or, as if this were not enough, to out-vie the Jewish Synagogue in the Sin of Contradiction to Christ, they adde, that every such offering is a propitiatorie Sacrifice as well for some that be dead, as for the living. And I think such Oblations as they make, do the one sort as little good or as little harm as they doe the other, unlesse they sollicite the Priest to make this kind of Attonement for them. But to such Sollicitors or Executors of such Sollicitations both Doctrine and Practise must needs create as great danger as any Heresie, or Branch of Contradicting Infidelitie hath done or can do to the mainteiners of it. This Branch of the Roman Churches Doctrine doth as punctually Contradict that Fundamental Do∣ctrine, Heb. 9. 13. [If the bloud of Bullocks and Goats, &c.] as it doth the foreci∣ted Passages, Heb. 10.

Page 3264

5. But the authorized practise of consecrating their Holy water for remission of sinnes and Sanctification, is most palpably Contradictory to our Apo∣stles meaning, or to the meaning of the holy Spirit in that other Instance of the Water of Sprinkling, wherein the Ashes of the Red Cow were Special Ingredi∣ents, and gave the vertue and Tincture unto it, for purifying men from such Legal uncleannesse, as the best Ceremonies of the Law and This Water in spe∣cial was Consecrated for. The Law for the Consecrating This water, and the Use or Ends for which it was Consecrated we have Numb. 19. The mistaking of which place, and the gross misse-use of the like water solemnly consecra∣ted by that Canonical Authoritie, which the Romish Church doth challenge ver all other Churches, is set down in such plain terms, that no honest heart∣ed Roman Catholick specially of the English, Scotish, Netherlandish or German Nation, if he be able to read the New Testament in his own Native Language, but he will be either heartily sorry for Alexander the fifth who made this Canon, or at least ashamed that their Forefathers should approve it, or that it should be practised by their Instructers, if they would permit them to have the reason of the Canon or Decree rightly translated into a Language which they understand. The Canon with the Glosse upon it is here transcribed in the same words wherein it was first conceived and published. In Decreti 3. part. de Consecrat. distinct. 3. c. 20. prout habetur in Corpore Juris Canonici, Jussu Gregorii 13. Lugd. impress, Anno 1618.

6. Sic se habet Glossa in hunc locum.

Aquam Sale] Haec est decima pars distinct. Secundùm Jo. de Fant.

CASUS. Quaeritur cur aqua cum sale benedicatur? Et respondetur, ut ea homines aspersi sanctificentur. Cum enim in vetere Testamento cinis vitulae sanctificabat, & sal per manum Helisaei Prophetae sanavit sterilitatem aquae, multò magis aqua cum sale benedicta omnia conspersa purificat.

Aquam saleu conspersam populis benedicimus, ut eâ cuncti aspersi sanctificentur,x & purificentur. Quod & omnibus sacerdotibus faciendum esse mandamus. Nam si cinis vi∣tulae y sanguine asper sus populum sanctificabat,a at{que} mundabat,b multo magis aqua sale asper∣sa divinis{que} precibus sacrata populum sanctificat at{que} mundat. Et si sale asperso per Helisae∣um c Prophetam sterilitas aquae sanata est, quanto magis divinis precibus sacratus sal sterili∣tatem rerum aufer humanarum, & coinquinatosd sanctificat, mundat, at{que} purgat, & caetera bona multiplicat, insidias diaboli avertit, & à Phantasmatum versutiis homines defendit?

Page 3265

7. But wherein did the Roman Church so grosly mistake the meaning of the Holy Ghost in that instance of the Red Heifer, Heb. 9. ver. 13. Or, to what mischievous inconvenience doth her practise unto this day, upon this mistake amount? To no less inconvenience, to no lower degree of Antichristian Impietie then this, that the Legal Priests with their Ceremonies or Sacrifi∣ces should be truer Types of every Masse-Priest, whether of higher or low∣er Rank, and of their services, then of Christ Jesus our high Priest, or of his everlasting Sacrifice, and perpetual Function: Both which were and are performed by him in his own Person, not by any Deputies or Vicars. But to me it is no wonder, if that Church do make Aaron, Eleazar, and their Suc∣cessors rather Types of Masse-Priests then of Christ: seeing (as hath been observed before) they make Melchizedeck himself (according to whose Order the Son of God only was to be consecrated high-Priest) a more lively Type of meanest Masse-Priests, then any true adumbration or shadow of Christ Jesus; and the Service of the Masse-Priests at the Altar to be the accom∣plishment of Melchizedecks Priesthood.

8. Had then the Anniversarie sacrifices of Buls and Goats upon the Day of Attonement no Reference or relation to the Sacrament, of Christs Bodie and Bloud? Nor the water of sprinkling mingled with the ashes of the Red Heifer, no semblance with the Sacramental water of Baptism? Yes doubt∣lesse, both these Ceremonies had special Reference unto, and exact sem∣blance with these two Blessed Sacraments: And yet were both of them sha∣dows or Types only of Christs Bloudy sacrifice upon the Crosse, and of the perpetual Exercise of his Everlasting Priesthood, since he ascended into his hea∣venly Tabernacle. Christ Jesus only and his everlasting Priest-Hood is the very Body or solid substance of all Legal Rites or services: And of this Body the Anniversarie sacrifices, whether of Attonement or others, were true Types or shadows. And of the same Body or Substance, the Sacraments of his body and bloud, and of Baptism are somewhat more then Types; True Representations of what is past, assured Pledges of all the Blessings promi∣sed to the Fathers and Patriarchs in the Old Testament, and actually Exhibi∣ted in a better manner, then they were to them, unto all Believers, since his entrance into the most Holy Place.

Notes

  • u

    Aquam Sale] Quia per aquam confessio, per salem amaritudo signatur & morsio, unde haec est mistura unde geminus procedit partus, divisio sc. delictorum, & ortus virtutum & bo∣norum operum 32. q. 1. c. Cum renuntiatur. Haec designata est per mistionem Judae, qui con∣fessio dicitur; & Thamar, quae amaritudo dicitur; unde Phares divisio, Zaran ortus, ge∣minus sc. partus provenit. H U.

  • Hu, stands for Hugo Card. Arch. for Ar∣chidiaconus. su. for supra. in. for infra.

  • x

    Sanctificentur] Quaeritur quomodo aqua benedicta dicatur populum sanctificare vel mundare. ADDITIO. Ad hoc potest responderi secundum id quod no: Su. ea dist. 2. c. Signum, in glo. 2. vers. propter humilitatem &c, aliâs illa glossa ponitur, ea. d. c. insti∣stutio. ARCH.

  • y

    Cinis vitulae] Historia legitur in Levitico, quòd decimâ die Septembris tollebat sa∣cerdos de proprio vitulam rufam trimam & immaculatam quae nondum portaverat Jugum, & immolabat eam pro peccato suae domus: & hircum quem sumebat ab universâ mul••••tudine, immolabat propeccato populi: Pelles & carnes & fimum vitulae, & Hircum comburebat ex∣trâ, & cinerem servabat: & inde per totum annum fiebat aspersio aquae quâ purificabantur immundi de quibusdam quae in lege immunditiae dicebantur: ut putà, si aliquis tetigisset ca∣daver hominis mortui vel Sepulchrum, erat immundus us{que} ad diem septimam: & hâc aquâ mundabatur.

  • a

    Sanctificabat] Tunc sanguis vitulae fuit remissio peccatorum, ut 12. q. 2. c. Gloria.

  • b

    Mundabat] A venialibus. Su. distinct. 50. c. in Capite. jn. dist. 4. c. nequaquam Nam sacrificiis venialia delentur. Su. d. 2. c. cum omne de poen. dist. 3. c. de quoti∣anis. Nam si qua tunc habebant, mortalia erant. de poen. dist. 6. ca. 1. Circa medium. PER HELIS AEVM.] Historia legitur in lib. Reg. qd. cum Helisaeus esset in ere∣mo, venerunt ad eum viri civitatis & dixerunt: Ecce habitatio hujus civitatis optima est, sicu tu ipse benè nosti, sed aquae pessimae sunt & steriles. At ille ait: Afferte mihi vas novum, & mittite in illud salem: & ait: Dicit Dominus, & sanavi istas aquas, & non erit ultrà in eis mors neque sterilitas. Sanatae ergo sunt aquae ille us{que} ad diem hunc juxta verbum Helisaei quod locutus est Dominus.

  • c

    Per Helisaeum] Inde est quod cum aqua exorcizatur dicit sacerdos: [Deus qui per Helisaeum Prophetam salem in aquam mitti jussisti, &c.]

  • d

    Et Coinquinatos] venialibus tantùm.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.