The church-history of Britain from the birth of Jesus Christ until the year M.DC.XLVIII endeavoured by Thomas Fuller.

About this Item

Title
The church-history of Britain from the birth of Jesus Christ until the year M.DC.XLVIII endeavoured by Thomas Fuller.
Author
Fuller, Thomas, 1608-1661.
Publication
London :: Printed for Iohn Williams ...,
1655.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
University of Cambridge -- History.
Great Britain -- Church history.
Waltham Abbey (England) -- History.
Cite this Item
"The church-history of Britain from the birth of Jesus Christ until the year M.DC.XLVIII endeavoured by Thomas Fuller." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A40655.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 21, 2024.

Pages

Abbeys engrossed trade, impoverished Parish. Priests, encouraged Offenders.

THE specious pretences of piety, and con∣tempt of the world, Abbots and Monks, were notoriously covetous, even to the in∣jury of others: Witnesse their renting and stocking of Farms, keeping of Tan-houses, and Brew-houses in their own hands. For, though the Monks themselves were too fine-nosed to dabble in Tan-fatts, yet they kept others (bred in that trade) to follow their work. These Covents having barke of their own woods, hides of the cattle of their own breeding and killing: and (which, was the main) a large stock of money to buy at the best hand, and to allow such Chap∣men they sold to, a long day of payment, easily eat out such who were bred up in that vocation. Whereupon, in the one and twentieth of King Henry the eighth, a Statute was made, That no Priest, either Regular or Secular, should on heavy pe∣nalties hereafter meddle with such mechanick employments.

2. Secondly, they impoverished Parish-Priests, by decrying their performances, and magnifying their own merits. Alas! what was the single devotion of a silly Priest in comparison of a Corporation of Prayers (twisted Cables to draw down blessings on their Patrons heads) from a whole Monastery? And, suppose (which was seldome done) the Parson in the Parish preaching to his people, yet Sermons in a Church once constituted were needlesse, as ministring matter of Schismes and disputes, and at the best onely profiting the present: whilest prayers benefitted as well the absent, as the present, dead, as living. But especially prayers of Mona∣steries

Page 283

commanded Heaven, pleased with the holy violence of so many and migh∣ty petitioners. By these and other artifices they undermined all Priests in the affections of their own people, and procured from Pope and Prince, that many Churches Presentative, with their Glebes and Tithes, were app-ropriated to their Covents, leaving but a poor pittance to the Parish Vicar: though the Pope (as styling himself but a Vicar) ought to have been more sensible of their sad con∣dition.

3. Besides appropriation of such Churches, Abbeys also wronged Parish-Priests, by procuring from the Pope Paschal the second, Anno Dom. 1100, in the Councel of Mentz, that their Demesnes, Farmes, and Granges (antiently paying Tithes like the Lands of other Lay-men) should hereafter be free from the same. But this exemption was afterwards by Pope Adrian the fourth, about the year 1150, justly limited and restrained: Religious Order being enjoyned the payment of Tithes of whatsoever increase they had in their own occupation (save of new im∣provements by culture of pasture of their cattle,a and of garden fruits. Onely three Orders, namely, the Cistertians, Templers, and Knights-Hospitallers (other∣wise called of S. John's of Jerusalem) were exempted from the generall payment of all Tithes whatsoever.

4. And, why Cistertians rather than any other Order? Give me leave to con∣jecture three Reasons thereof:

  • 1. Adrian the fourth, our none Countrey-man, was at first a Benedictine-Monke of S. Albans, and these Cistertians were onely Benedictines refined.
  • 2. They were the Benjamins, one of the youngest remarkable Orders of that Age, and therefore made Darlings (not to say Wantons) by the Holy Father the Pope.
  • 3. It is suspitious, that by bribery in the Court of Rome, they might obtain this priviledge, so beneficial unto them. For, I finde, that K. Richard the first disposed his Daughter Avarice to be married to the Cister∣tian-Order, as the most grasping and griping of all others.

I leave it others to render Reasons why Templers and Hospitallers, being meer Lay-men, and divers times of late, adjudged in the Court of Aides inb Paris, no part of the Clergie should have this priviledge to be exempted from Tithes. But we remember they were Sword-men, and that aweth all into obedience.

5. However the Lateran-Councell, holden Anno 1215, Ordered, That this pri∣viledge of Tithe-freedome to the aforesaid three Orders, should not extend to Post∣nates (as I may term them) to Covents erected since the Lateran-Councell, nor to Lands since bestowed on the aforesaid Orders, though their Covents were erected be∣fore that Councell. Therefore when the covetous Cistertians (contrary to the Ca∣nons of that Councell) purchased Bulls from the Pope to discharge their Lands from Tithes: Henry the fourth, pitying the plea of the poor Parish Priest, by Statute nulled suchc Bulls, and reduced their Lands into that state wherein they were before.

6. Once it was in my minde to set to down a Catalogue (easie to doe, and usefull when done) of such houses of Cistertians, Templers, and Hospitallers, which were founded since the Lateran Councell, yet going under the generall notion of Tithe∣free, to the great injury of the Church. But since on second thoughts, I conceived it better to let it alone, as not sure on such discovery of any blessing from those Ministers which should gain, but certain of many curses from such Lay-men who should lose thereby.

7. Now, when King Henry the eight dissolved Monasteries, there was put into His hand an opportunity and advantage to ingratiate Himself and His memory for ever; namely, by restoring Tithes appropriated to Abbeys, to their respective

Page 284

Parishes. But, whether He wanted minde; or minding, or both, God would not doe Him so much honour, that He should doe so much honour to God, and his Church; being now past like Lay-fees with the rest of the Abbey-land, to the great empairing of the just maintenance of Ministers.

8. Lastly, one grand mischief (to omit many others) done by Monasteries, was by the priviledges of Sanctuaries, whereby their houses became the sink and center of sinners, to the great dishonour of God, and obstruction of justice.

9. And here I commend the memory of Turketill, once Abbot of Crowland, being confident that the Reader will joyn with me in his commendation. Such vast immunities were bestowed on that Covent by Witlaffe, Kingd of Mercia, that if any Officer did follow an Offender, of what nature soever, to fetch him out of that Liberty, he was to have his right foot cut off. Strange exchange! when a legall Presecutor is made a Malefactour, and the Malefactour an Innocent; such the con∣verting power of a Monkish Asylum. But in processe of time, and depredation of the Danes, this priviledge was lost, and profered afterwards by some Saxon Kings to be restored; which Turketill would never consent unto: and take it in thee Au∣thors own words, Antiquam verò loci impunitatem vel immunitatem nullo modo consensit acquirere, ne sceleratis & impiis refugium à publicis legibus videretur in aliquo praebere, & cum hujusmodi maleficiis compelleretur, vel in aliquo contra con∣scientiam suam cohabitare, seu consentire. This Priviledge other Churches of S. Albans, Beverly, Westminster, did accept. Such Sanctuaries were grievances constantly complained of in Parliaments, till Richard the second first began, Hen∣ry the fourth and seventh proceeded to regulate them as abused and usurping, and Henry the eighth utterly abolished them as uselesse and unlawfull.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.