The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.

About this Item

Title
The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author
Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication
London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,
1617.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

Of Corruption, and the thing Corrupted.
WHat is Corruption?

Corruption is contrary to Generation, and is the de∣struction of the thing engendred, and the thing destroyed is said to be corrupted.

How may we reason from Corruption, to the thing Corrupted?

Thus: To execute theeues and murtherers, is profitable to the Common-wealth: Ergo, theeues and murtherers are hurt∣full to the Common-wealth. The death of Uirgil was a great losse to learning: Ergo, Vir. was a great furtherance to learning.

How may we reason from the thing Corrupted, to the Corruption?

Affirmatiuely thus: Uirgil was a great furtherance to lear∣ning: Ergo, the death of Virgil was a great losse to learning.

What be the maxims of these two places?

Those things whereof the end and destruction is laudable, must needs of themselues be pernitious and hurtfull. And con∣trariwise, those things whose ende and destruction is hurtfull, must needs of themselues be good and profitable. Againe, of good things, the losse is euill, and of euill things, the losse is good: but in reasoning from these places, you must take heede that as well the Corruption, as the thing corrupted, bee abso∣lutely good, or euill of it selfe, and not by Accident: for it were no good argument to reason thus; The death of Christ was good: Ergo, Christ was euill: for his death was good by acci∣dent for our saluation, and not for any crime that was in him. Moreouer, you must beware that you vse not one self predicate both in your antecedent, & in your consequent: for if good be the predicate in the antecedēt, euill must be the predicate in the consequent, and if euil be the predicate in the antecedent, good

Page 100

must be the predicate in the consequent: for this kinde of rea∣soning consisteth of contraries.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.