The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.

About this Item

Title
The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author
Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication
London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,
1617.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 2, 2024.

Pages

Of the place of Generation, and of the thing engendred.
WHat is Generation?

It is the first being or springing of any thing.

How are arguments to be fetched from Generation to the thing engendred?

Affirmatiuely thus: It was good that Christ was borne: Er∣go Christ was good; It was euill for Rome that Catiline was borne: Ergo, Catiline was euill to Rome.

What be the Maxims of this place?

Those things whose generation is good, must needs bee good, and those things whose generation is euill, must needes be euill.

Page 99

How may we reason from the thing engendred to the Generation?

Affirmatiuely thus: Catiline was euill to Rome: Ergo, the birth of Catiline was euill to Rome.

What be the maxims of this place?

If the thing engendred be either good or euill, the generati∣on thereof must needes be also either good or euill.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.