¶The sixt Rule.
There ought not to be mo termes
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
There ought not to be mo termes
in an argumentacion then thre, for o∣therwise there is no good argument.
Euerie politicall Magistrate ought to kepe vnder disobedient persones, with corporall punish∣ment.
Peter is an Apostle.
Therefore Peter shoulde pu∣nishe the disobedient.
In this argument, is no ioynyng to¦gether of the first proposition, and the second: for the politicall magistrate, & an Apostle, are two maner of thynges. Therfore it hāgeth together like ger∣maines lyppes as we vse to saye.