To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
In an argumēt, called Syllogismus there ought not to be doubtfull wor∣des, or mo wordes in ye conclusion then was before rehersed. For mo thinges to be in the conclusion, this example shall serue which An••honius maketh in the first boke of Tullie de oratore.
Unprofitable thynges are not to be taught.
In Philosophie are vnpro∣fitable thinges.
Ergo philosophie is not to be taught
This argument is to be denied, be∣cause
there is more in the conclusion, then was rehersed in the two first pro∣positions. For this shuld haue bene the conclusiō. Some vnprofitable thynges whiche be in philosophie, are not to be learned, not yt philosophie it selfe is to be reiected, for els we myght make this argument likewise.
Dronkenes is not to be al∣lowed.
In drinking is often times dronkenes.
Therfore drinkyng at any tyme is not to be allowed.
Therefore we must frame our argu¦ment so, that nothing be more in the cō¦clusion, then was in the other proposi∣tions. As thus.
Dronkenes is not to be al-alowed.
In some drinkyng is often¦times dronkenes.
Therefore some drinkyng is not to be allowed.