Prophets, of the propagation, amplitude, and glory of the Church, is most clearely witnessed by Histories: and supposing lastly out of D. Iohn White, in his Way. p. 338. That things past cannot be shewed to vs, but by Histo∣ries. Supposing al this (I say) it is most apparant, That (if there cannot be produced (as there cannot) names of Protestants, or of any other Professors of Christian Faith, in al ages, out of Histories, to whom Gods Promises a∣gree, beside those which are knowne Roman Catho∣likes) not Protestants, nor any other, but onely the Ro∣man Catholikes are the true Church of Christ; which teacheth the true Faith, and of which al sorts are to learne infallible Faith, necessarie to Saluation.
But as for the argument, which D. Featly wil needes perswade vs not to be Petitio principy, but Demonstratio a priori: viz.
That Church, whose Faith is eternal, and perpetual, and vnchanged, is so visible, as the Catholike Church ought to be, and as the Popish Church by M. Fisher is pretended to be.
But the Faith of Protestants Church is eternal, perpe∣tual, and vnchanged.
Ergo, The Protestants Church is so visible as the Ca∣tholike Church ought to be, and the Popish Church is pretended by M. Fisher to be.
This argument, as it is set downe, is so farre from be∣ing a Demonstration (whose propertie is to conuince the Vnderstanding) as it is not a probable or Moral per∣swasion: For I am verily perswaded, that no wise man (not alreadie possessed with Protestant opinions) wil or can be so much as morally conuinced, or in any sort pro∣bably perswaded by it, That Protestants be the true visible Church; more then a man (in case of doubt) can be by the like argument, which a man may make to proue him∣selfe