~Proceedings ICMCISMCI2014 14-20 September 2014, Athens, Greece Table 3. Estimated Results vs. Actual Results Category Estimated Actual Radio 5288 10057 Piano 798 752 Drums 644 741 Karaoke 740 246 DAW 226 138 MPC / Sampler 220 136 Table 4. Clustering Results Cluster Number of Apps Number of Categories 1 6 1 2 94 9 3 29 3 4 191 12 5 3 1 6 14 1 7 27 6 8 57 7 9 24 2 10 63 5 11 19 6 12 2 1 categories of test data was ineffective, even when using the whitelisted name and the whitelisted description. The apps both failed to cluster in groups around their categories, and failed to give correct numbers of apps per cluster. Table 4 shows the number of apps per cluster, and Table 5 shows the categories per cluster. Figures 1 and 2 shows the results of this clustering, with its dimensionality reduced via principle component analysis (PCA). As can be seen, each cluster does not contain only a single category. It was also hoped that PCA might allow for manual segmentation of each category. However, as can be seen by the PCA of the data in Figure 3, this was not possible: the categories are too intermingled to be able to draw useful segment boundaries. O ' ke 10-2 tar Table 5. Clustering Breakdown Cluster Category Breakdown 1 Radio: 6. Guitar: 29, Piano: 21, Karaoke: 14, DAW: 9, DJ: 2 8, Amp: 6, Synth: 3, Artist: 2, Sequencer: 2. 3 Drum: 15, MPC: 9, Sequencer: 5. Artist: 67, Synth: 34, Piano: 25, DJ: 22, Guitar: 4 15, Sequencer: 13, Radio: 5, Amp: 3, MPC: 3, Drum: 2, DAW: 1, Karaoke: 1. 5 Drum: 3. 6 Radio: 14. Karaoke 9, Amp: 8, Guitar: 5, Piano: 2, DAW: 2, Sequencer: 1. 8 Sequencer: 16, DJ 14, Synth: 10, MPC: 10, Drum: 4, DAW: 3. 9 Radio: 23, Artist: 1. 10 Drum: 26, MPC: 19, Sequencer: 13, Synth: 3, DAW: 2. 11 Amp: 9, DAW: 5, Piano: 2, DJ: 1, Guitar: 1, Karaoke 1. 12 Radio: 2. 1 4 U -5,sveu~enic r pequenceq e eg quet'Weqp.r UM. -8 -- -.4 Component I -2 0 Figure 2. Labeled K-Means clusters, zoomed in. U. lii-i o 2.-Iv anoOynth ' t ir t ruh ~ i3 thrtst pynth yrrth ptistt ' fth ynth t }.2 0.4 6 06 10 1.2 Cornponerst I Irur 15 -20 -10 0 120 30 Component 1 Figure 1. Labeled K-Means clusters. Figure 3. PCA data, zoomed in. - 567 -
Top of page Top of page