hatred on the one hand, and the strength of natural affection on the other; and when these are set in con|trast, as in the case of Joseph and his brethren; when the events are so unexpected, so interesting, and at last terminate so well, the story becomes too impassioned to be read with stoical insensibility. A man of senti|ment and of piety can never read it with an unaffected ••eart, or with eyes unsuffused with tears.—From it w•• farther learn that guilt is fearful and suspicious.— Thus, the brethren of Joseph, are under fearful ap|prehensions (since their father was dead, who was the centre of union,) left Joseph, now in power, should take deserved vengeance upon them who had designed, and really, for a time, brought him into most unhap|py circumstances. From these suspicions they sent messengers to him, informing that it was the dying injunction of their common parent, that they should confess their fault, and ask forgiveness; hoping from the benignity of his disposition, that he would in consequence thereof, restore them to his favor.— They were not mistaken. The injured brother, al|ways generous, humane and god-like, most heartily forgave them, assigning this particular reason for his conduct, "you thought evil against me, but God meant it for good," &c.
The occurrence to which my text alludes, has a near affinity, in its origin and final issue, to the tragical event, which eight years ago took place in this town, destined, by divine providence, to be the stage on which a most memorable scene was acted. The instances are not, indeed, in all respects, parallel; and who could expect to find, even in the bible, that copious book, an instance exactly similar to that which then happened in this place; which ushered in the American war, and gave rise to this anniversary, which