WE have already been considering the Nature of a Sacrament in general, to which every particular Sacrament is to be re∣d••••ed and can be no f••rther acknowledged to be so, than as it agrees with the Description given of it; which will therefore facilitate our consideration of the particular: Neverthe∣less, there are the differences between the one and the other, which will need a particular Disquisition, which we are now to pass to. We observed, that under the New-Testament, there are Two and no more; and the first of these, which now comes under our Confiera∣tion, is Baptism: And that this is the first in Order will be evident, if we consider, what It is nextly a Sign and Seal of, and that is the New Birth, or our entrance into Covenant with Gel; whereas the other points to our Growth, or our Establishment in the Convenant Now an Infant must be Born, before it can Grow; it must have Life, in order to it's receiving of Nourishment; we must be United unto Christ, before we can have Communion with him in all his Benefits. Here then, we may make some little enquiry into the Nature of this Ordinance. Concerning the word Baptism, there need not much be said, tho' there are hot Disputes about it. The word it self is used either in a proper, or a trans••••titious sense. Properly it signifys two things indifferently, viz. to Sprinkle and to Immerge; either to cast water upon a thing or to Plunge it into it; and is used in both senses in Greek Classick Authors; and hence from the Etymon of the word, there can be no Argument made for the one, more than the other. In a translatious sense, it is used sometimes for the suffering grievous Affictions, and for the communication of the ex••rordinary Gifts of the Holy Ghost: But here we are to understand it properly: and those that would have it meerly Metaphorical, do err•• not knowing the Truth, or seeking to pervert it. We have therefore the true Nature of this Ordinance laid before us in the Description give••; where observe,
1. THE general Nature of it; it is a Sacra∣ment: And that it is so will appear in the lay∣ing open of the Description; in every part wher of it agrees with what hath before been said about the Nature of a Sacrament; as to the Istitution, Parts, and Design of it.
2. We have the special Nature of it; con∣taining the things in which it is differenced from the other. And here we are to con∣sider,
1. THE outward Sign, the washing with Wa∣ter. And here,
1. THE Element it self which is to be used in the Administration of this Ordinance, viz. Water. Some observing a difference between external and internal Baptism, do constitute two Sacraments of them, but very absurdly; for these only point out the two parts mate∣rial. viz. the Sign, and the thing signified by it; or the external act Ministerial, and the internal Act of the Spirit of God: so then the Element is Water; and no other thing is to be used instead of it: This is the Sign, and is not Natural, but Arbitrary, and de∣pended on his Pleasure. And this is ex∣presly set down in the Gospel: Hence that, Matth. 3.11. I indeed baptize you with wa••er unto repentance; but he that cometh after, is might••er than I, wh••se shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the bo••y Ghost, and with fire. Acts 3.36. And as they want on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See here is teater, what doth hinder me to be baptized? John the Bap∣tist used Water; and for that reason he chose places to Baptize, where there was a sufficiency for it. As to those that make additions and mixtures of Salt, Spittle, Oyl and Ho••ey, they are Superstitious, and do so far recede from the Primitive Simplicity of this Ordinance. And the reason why Christ chose this Element, was doubtless from the aptitude of it, to represent and signify the thing aimed at in it, and that is our Regene∣ration, in which we are washed and cleansed. And for this reason the Spirit is frequently compared to Water; and the Promise of Re∣generating Grace is expressed by this Meta∣phor, Ezek. 36.2••. Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols will I cleanse you. Our Justification is also compre∣hended in it, because by it we are made legal∣ly Clean; for which reason we are told, 1 Joh. 1.7. And the blood of Jesus Christ his Son, clean∣seth us from all sin. We are therefore told of a Fountain which God would open for this pur∣pose, Zech. 13.11. which hath a reference to this; and hence we are told of the washing of Regeneration, Tit. 3.5.
2. WE have the Use which is to be made of this Element, in the Administration of this Or∣dinance; and that is, Washing with it. The meaning whereof is in general, that it is to be applied to the Flesh: It is therefore cal∣led the putting away the filthiness of the flesh, 1 Pet. 3.21. And when he saith it is not so, the meaning is, that this is not the thing sig∣nified by it; and this had not been needful to mention, but because it was the external Sign, but that it had an higher aim in it; hence it is not to be applied to the Garment, but to the Body it self. And here is that Question to be looked into, about which there have been such grievous Contentions in the World; viz. Whether this Ordinance, as to the Cer••mo∣nial part of it, is to be applied by Aspersion or by Immersions. True, there would be no need of Controversy here, if our Opposites would be as Candid in this Affair as we are; who do not Dispute for the necessary affixing of it to one, but account it indifferent in it self, and may be governed by Circumstances. But there are those that make Immersion Essenti∣al, and deny the reality of our Baptism, be∣cause it is applied by Aspersion. As to the Plea from the Notation of the words, which is made so much of i••s weakness is sufficiently evident, not only because the use, of words is