ADDITIONS to BARKSHIRE.
[a] WHAT the original of this Coun∣ty's name may be, is much har∣der to determine; than to show that those which are common∣ly produc'd, are certainly false. The Berrock and Beroke might have something in them, if our Author's name of the Shire, Berrocscyre, were the true one. From whence he had it, I know not; nor can I be so uncharitable as to believe, he would mo∣del it so on purpose to suit that conjecture. 'Tis plain however from the most ancient Annals of the Saxons, that the old name was Bearrucscire, which according to different ages we find afterwards first written Bearrucsyre, and then Barrucscire; from which the present name is easily melted.
[b] As for the Isis, being call'd afterwards Thami∣sis; neither the true name of the river is in any an∣cient Record, Isis, (which was forg'd at first to encou∣rage that opinion of Thame and Isis;) nor is the meet∣ing of those two rivers the cause of Thamisis, it being call'd Tems all along before their joyning, as well as after. For the proof of both, it may be sufficient to refer the Reader to what is observ'd before upon this subject, in * Wiltshire.
At the south part of Oxford, there begins a great Causey, going from Frier-Bacon's study, near two miles towards Abingdon ‖; which one would imagine had been a work of the Romans, but that it appears by Record to have been made by Robert Doiley in the time of William the Conqueror.
[c] The Thames running by Oxford, goes on to Abingdon, which as it is now the Shire town for all publick business; so was it formerly eminent for Meetings about the weighty affairs of the whole King∣dom. For which reason, and it's ancient name Sheo∣vesham (written by Leland, whether from Record or by a mistake I know not, Seukesham,) I am enclin'd to think this the very place wherein two Synods were held, one in the year 742. and the other in 822. both said to be at Clofes-hoo. For tho' Mr. Cam∣den settles it in Kent, yet he expresses himself not fully convinc'd of the certainty of his opinion: and I know not of any Author that agrees with him in calling it Clives at Ho; which indeed gives the greatest colour to his opinion. But what he himself suggests, that it seems to have been in Mercia, and that that is not by any means a convenient place for a Synod or Coun∣cil, are unanswerable objections. For one may ima∣gine that Aethelbald King of the Mercians had the greatest hand in it, because the Saxon Annals men∣tion him particularly, as present; and that in Kent is too much in a corner to answer the character of Clofeshoo, mention'd only twice in the Annals, and both times expresly said to be the place of a Synod. And in a Council at Hertford, in 672. we find it de∣creed, that there should be two Synods yearly; but because there are several incidental causes might prevent them, it was unanimously agreed however that there should one meet yearly the first day of August, at the place call'd Clofeshoh. Which can never be suppos'd, unreason∣ably to point out a place so little for the convenience of most of the members; but may very rationally be meant of Abingdon, a place perhaps as eligible by all parties as could well be thought of. At present this town is particularly honour'd by affording to the right honourable James Bertie the title of Earl.
[d] From hence we come to White-horse-hill, the head of the river Ock; above which, by Ashbury-park,