their fathers, but when they imbraced the faith & were converted.
Secondly, If both the Parents were Iewes, and did not beget their children in wedlocke, then the children were secluded from the inheritance, Iudg. 11. 2. Thou shalt not inherite with us, because thou art the sonne of a strange woman.
Thirdly, If an Israelite had married a bond-woman, then the children were secluded from the inheritance, although their fathers were free; those who were borne of Handmaids were alwayes reputed servants; and God applyed this to Christ himselfe as he was man, Esay 49. 5. I haue called my servant from the wombe; so Esay 42. 1. Behold my servant whom I uphold, my Elect in whom my soule is well pleased. Marie called her selfe the Lords handmaide. Luk. 1. 28. therefore Christ as man borne of Marie the hand-maide, was a servant.
But yee will say, that things take their denomination [Object.] from the best part; as Water and Wine mixed together, is called Wine; so Chaffe & Wheat mingled together, yet it is called Wheat; Why then should not the childe be reckoned to be free, after his father, and not recko∣ned bond, after his mother, who is a bond-woman?
In Physicall mixtures it is so, but it is not so in mar∣riage; [Answ.] this is rather like that which is spoken in the Schooles, Conclusio sequitur deteriorem partem, if any of the premisses be particular, so is the conclusion.
The Doctors of the Iewes propound this case, if a Heathenish captiue woman were taken in the Warres, she is converted and becommeth a Proselyte; whether should her childe be judged to be a free man or not in Israel? And they answere, that this childe borne of this stranger, is not to be counted a free man, Verum Senatus suo decreto Lustrari eum tantum curat, they cause onely to wash him, but they will not circumcise him, untill he