that hee receiueth the Gentiles, in those which follow.
The Argument whereby he proueth the assumption of the Iewes, is taken from the destinate end of his humiliation, which was, to confirme the truth of God, and the promises of the Fathers: thus,
Hee who became the minister of Circumcision to con∣firme the truth of God, and the promises of the Fa∣thers, assumeth the Iewes.
But for such end was Christ the minister of the Circum∣cision.
Therefore, &c.
In this Verse are two parts: a Description of the humilia∣tion of Christ, and the end thereof.
The humiliation of Christ in these words; Iesus Christ was a minister of Circumcision: not that he administred the Sacrament of Circumcision,
as neyther did he baptise; but because by his comming he sanctified Circumcision, and all other Shadowes and Ceremonies,
and made them effectuall, as a learned man expounds: which sense if it be admitted, it affords this Obseruation.
If the Sacraments be effectuall vnto vs, [Obser.] to confirme vs in grace, and to worke vs vnto a power against sinne vnto god∣linesse; it is a signe that wee are receiued: but if wee being baptised, and comming to the Lords Table, are not so en∣abled, it is a signe we are not receiued.
But there is another more apt interpretation, which the most doe follow, and that is, to take Circumcision for the Circumcised, the Abstract for the Concrete; meaning the Iewes, to whom that Sacrament and Ceremony was com∣manded. So often with Paul, as Rom. 4.12. Gal. 2.7.8.
The Minister of Circumcision: implying a meane and labo∣rious seruice, as our Sauiour speakes of himselfe, The sonne of man came not to be ministred vnto,
but to minister, and giue his life a ransome for many.
For the truth of God, to confirme, &c. In these words is the end of his humiliation; which is double: the vtmost end, for the truth of God; the next, to confirme the promises made vnto the Fathers.