to giue his verdict vpon the Doctrine it selfe. For, otherwayes, no fauour, nor benefit what soeuer could yeald contētment vnto my grei∣ued soule.
I leaue it vnto others to consider, how his Grace standeth affected vnto truth: as for me, I trust, that I haue giuen a sufficient demon∣stration, on my part, that I would rather loose my liberty of speach, then that shee should want my vttermost defence.
Here the indifferent Reader may also con∣ceiue with me, that if my Doctrine had bene liable vnto a iust censure, then surely his Gra∣ce would haue made no stay to condemne it in solemne manner; especially since it was so publiquely taught, so earnestly defended by me; and since I did now entirely desire him to do me iustice without any fauour.
But since this Doctrine was not subiect vnto his condemnation, why then had his Grace so little reuerence vnto the eternall truth of God, and so small respect of me, that he would suffer it to be so indignely censured by his vicegerent, & leaue me helplesse from such iniurious oppression? his pretenses to the contrary (if he haue any) are nothing but smoaky euaporations.
I am nothing, and worse then nothing. But I pleaded for iustice. In what? In a point