The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published.

About this Item

Title: The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published.
Author: Richardson, Alexander, of Queen's College, Cambridge.
Publication: London :: Printed by Gartrude Dawson, and are to be sold by Sam. Thomson at the White-Horse in Paul's Church-yard,; 1657.
Rights/Permissions: This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further further information or permissions.
Subject terms: Logic; Ramus, Petrus, -- 1515-1572; Talon, Omer, -- ca. 1510-1562
Cite this Item: "The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A91783.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 6, 2024.

Pages

Ironia est Tropus à contrar. ad contr.

SO that this Trope is only from those Arguments of contraries, and not of disparates, because they are too many. This definition is too general, for Relates are not so put one for another, because they are of more use in their agreeing affection, than in their disagreeing, but only is special to adversa contradicentia and privantia.