This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further further information or permissions.
This then is particular first in a simple syllogism, that the consequent part of the question is disposed with the third argument in the proposition, now whe∣ther before or after, we shall hear hereafter, for that is more particular; before in the definition of a syl∣logism
it was quaestio cum argumento, then quaestion is saltem consequens, here it is pars consequens in propo∣sitione, pars antecedens in assumptione: and whether this be before or after, we shall hear hereafter: so that is general to every simple syllogism. Conse∣quens in propositione, because that evermore is the more general part of the question, as we heard be∣fore, and the continent should hold more than the contentum, and the assumption assumitur è propositione, ergo, the consequent must be there, and the antecedent, therefore in the assumption he doth not say, conse∣quens disponitur cum argumento, for that is general before in the definition of a syllogisme.