The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published.

About this Item

Title: The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published.
Author: Richardson, Alexander, of Queen's College, Cambridge.
Publication: London :: Printed by Gartrude Dawson, and are to be sold by Sam. Thomson at the White-Horse in Paul's Church-yard,; 1657.
Rights/Permissions: This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further further information or permissions.
Subject terms: Logic; Ramus, Petrus, -- 1515-1572; Talon, Omer, -- ca. 1510-1562
Cite this Item: "The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A91783.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 6, 2024.

Pages

Attribui.

The attribute is alwayes the consequent part of the axiom: so that if we give them to subjects, they cannot be given to one and the same subject: they may be the consequent, but not the antecedent part: so that contraries must be attributed, for when I say homo est animal, aut brutum, I give them both to ani∣mal, but not eidem. Now antecedent contraries will have contrary consequents, est enim par ratio, now they do dissentire ratione, & re, ergo, cannot any wayes be consentanies, ergo, cannot be made by any means to agree.