feare or flattery) must advise and direct Roboam. Other attempts against Kings, the King of Kings hath neither com∣manded in his law, nor permitted in his Gospell. David (saith Ambrose) nullis legibus tenebatur, &c. David though hee were an adulterer, and an homicide, was tied to no law: for Kings are free from bonds, and can by no compulsion of law, bee drawne to punishment, being freed by the power of Government. Thus farre Ambr.
Saul the first King of Israel was rather a monster, then a man: after the Spirit of God had forsaken him, and the evill Spirit was come upon him. There were not many sinnes against God, Man, or Nature, wherein hee trangressed not; yet his excesse was punished, neither by the Sacerdotall Sy∣nod, nor the secular Senate: Who can lay his hand on the Lords annointed, and bee guiltlesse? The very Annointment was the cause of Sauls immunity from all humane coercion: as Augustine affirmeth, Quaero si non habebat, Saul sacramenti sanctitatem; quid in eo David venerabatur? If Saul had not the holinesse of the Sacrament, I aske what it was that Da∣vid reverenced in him? hee honoured Saul for the sacred and holy unction, while hee lived: and revenged his death. Yea, hee was troubled and trembled at the heart, because hee had cut off a lap of Sauls garment. Loe, Saul had no inno∣cency, and yet hee had holinesse: not of life, but of unction. So farre Augustine.
Who questioned David for his murther and adultery? who censured Solomon for his idolatry? though their crimes were capitall by the law of God. After that Kingdome was divided, all the Kings of Israel, and most of the Kings of Iu∣dah, were notorious Idolaters: yet during those Kingdomes, which endured above 200. yeares, no Priest did chalenge, no States-men did claime power from the highest, to pu∣nish or depose their Princes. And the Prophets perswaded all men to obey, and endure those idolatrous Princes, whose impiety they reproved with the losse of their lives.
Christ fled when the people would have made him a