Page 40
CHAP. VI.
That the Sacrament of Baptism lawfully administred ought not to be reiterated.
OF this judgment is Zanchy. Credimus praeterea, sicut Cir∣cumcisio in carne semel tantùm fiebat: sic Baptismum aqua qui circumcisioni successit, semel ritè ac legitimè susceptum non esse denuò repetendum. Furthermore we believe, that as Circumci∣sion was done onely once in the flesh; So the Baptism of water, which succeeded circumcision, being once rightly and lawfully received, ought not againe to be repeated. Of the same opini∣on is Beza. Jam verò quum quisquis semel Christo verè datus est, quamvis interdum deflectat, nunquam tamen for as ej••ciatur, ac perinde satis sit semel receptum esse, &c. There are Reasons rendred for this:
First, [unspec 1] because there is no commandment for the reiteration of it; Circumcision in whose room Baptism succeeded, was not to be reiterated.
Secondly, [unspec 2] lawfully done by a call'd Minister according to Christs institution, is not to be accounted frustrate.
Thirdly, [unspec 3] as carnall generation is but once, so our Spirituall regeneration or ingrafting into the Church is but once to be performed.
Fourthly, [unspec 4] the signification, force, use, and fruit of Baptisme continues not for a time, but the whole Life of the party bapti∣zed. This is seen by the confession of Reformed Churches. To such as are once truly baptized into the Church of Christ, there ought not to be any reiteration of Baptisme. Now if it be performed by Heretiques that deny the principles of doctrine, and corrupt the essentiall forme of Baptism, as the Arians, Sa∣mosatenians, and others that are not sincere in the doctrine of the Trinity, such ought to be baptized again, the first being of no validity: for the essentiall forme being taken away, the matter it selfe is also taken away, and this is no rebaptization,