Uniformity in humane doctrinall ceremonies ungrounded on 1 Cor. 14.40. or, a reply unto Dr. Hammonds vindication of his grounds of uniformity from the 1 Cor. 14.40. By Henry Jeanes, minister of Gods word at Chedzoy:

About this Item

Title: Uniformity in humane doctrinall ceremonies ungrounded on 1 Cor. 14.40. or, a reply unto Dr. Hammonds vindication of his grounds of uniformity from the 1 Cor. 14.40. By Henry Jeanes, minister of Gods word at Chedzoy:
Author: Jeanes, Henry, 1611-1662.
Publication: Oxford :: printed by A. Lichfield printer to the Universitie, for Tho. Robinson,; 1660.
Rights/Permissions: To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms: Theology, Doctrinal; Hammond, Henry, -- 1605-1660. -- Euschēmonōs kai kata taxin
Cite this Item: "Uniformity in humane doctrinall ceremonies ungrounded on 1 Cor. 14.40. or, a reply unto Dr. Hammonds vindication of his grounds of uniformity from the 1 Cor. 14.40. By Henry Jeanes, minister of Gods word at Chedzoy:." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A87511.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 18, 2024.

Pages

Dr. Hammond. sect. 39, 40••

But he hath thought fit to vary this Syllogisme, and give it in other terms, and the•• one might hope it would be exactly formed, 'Tis-thus,

It is impossible that the onely rule of decency should be undecent. But yet it is very pos∣sible that many customes should be indecent. Therefore he shall conclude, that custome is not the onely rule of decency.

40. But this is no Syllogisme neither, being far removed from the measure that Lo∣gicians exact, and such as by which I will prove any thing true, that is the most distant from it. For example, it is granted truth, that Law is the onely rule of Iustice, yet this I shall disprove by a Syllogisme exactly formed by Mr. J. his model. Thus,

It is impossible, that the onely rule of Iustice should be unjust. But yet it is very possible that many Laws should be unjust, Therefore I shall conclude that Law is not the onely rule of Justice,