PROPOSITION III.
A Tradesman bought a whole piece of Cloth con∣taining 28 ¾ yards, which did stand him in (with all charges defraid) 19 lb: 3 ss: 4 d. sterling, how
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
A Tradesman bought a whole piece of Cloth con∣taining 28 ¾ yards, which did stand him in (with all charges defraid) 19 lb: 3 ss: 4 d. sterling, how
should he sell it, whereby to gain 1/10 part in every yard, or forc'd unto so much loss in retail.
RULE 1. As the Denominator is to the price known, so the fractions summ.
As the quantity given,
RULE 2. so an Unite of the same.
This Questi∣on 〈 math 〉〈 math 〉 is stated ac∣cording to the Double Rule of Proportion, ei∣ther for gain or loss, by change∣ing the ex∣tremes in the first Rule, viz. in this 10 for 11, the fraction in all such cases making two terms; the Denominator in the first place being Divider, the price of the Wares or Merchandizes the se∣cond term, and the summe both of Numerator and Denominator must possess the third place, if for gain; but must be made Divider, if the Propositi∣on be for loss: the first number in the second Rule ought to be the quantity propounded, either in Number, Weight, or Measure; and the last Number an Unite on which the querie is made, of
gain or loss: or, which is all one, if an improper fraction as in the Table 4/4, the Denominators be∣ing made equal, viz. 135/4 and 4/4 and consequently may be omitted, one being a Multiplier, the other a Divider; their Products are these 1150/4 · 115/6 · 44/4 · the first and third Numerators may be reduced by 2, and their Denominators cancelled; they will stand thus, as in the third Table, viz. As 575 to 115/6 so 22 unto 253/345 which is in money 14 ss. 8 d, the price of one yard with the profit required.
The reason is evident; for if 20 ss were the In∣teger, the Numerator would have been 2 ss and consequently the proportion as 20 to the middle term, so 228 the summe of Numerator and De∣nominator to the gains required. This question may be easily solv'd without a Double Rule, as thus: by the first Proposition you may finde that one yard cost 13 ss. 4 d. 1/10 part of it is 1 ss. 4 d, the summe 14 ss. 8 d. as before: but this may be of good use in other questions, and therefore con∣veniently inserted.