A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter.

About this Item

Title
A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter.
Author
Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.
Publication
London :: Printed for Nevil Simons and Jonath. Robinson ...,
1676.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Cite this Item
"A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69541.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 3, 2024.

Pages

Reply.

I am 〈…〉〈…〉 Tiglndius speak the same as I do, and tha yo •••• your following words exictly agree with 〈…〉〈…〉 that point, asserting both a pro∣per imm〈…〉〈…〉 Will de Debito, distinct from that de Eventu; and a signal Will de Debito mtonym∣cally so called.

Page 309

I came but even now from heaping up forty Testimonies of our Divines that speak as I, and am loth to do that work again, unless it were more useful: But I remember I promised you something of Davenant's, because you oft mention him: And it is not any Sentences on the by, but his judgment fully and purposely delivered in Propositions, with their proof, how far Good-works are necessary. De Justit. Habit & Act. c. 30. p. 384. [1. Bona opera sunt necessaria omnibus fidelibus & Justificatis, qui habent usum rationis & per aetatem operari possunt.] Lege sequentia. Et cap. 31. p. 403. Conclus. 5. [Bona quaedam opera sunt necessaria ad Justificationem, ut conditiones concurrentes vel praecursoriae, licet non sint necessariae ut causae efficientes aut meritoriae] Lege pro∣bat. Conclus. 6. p. 404. Bona opera sunt necessaria ad Justificationis statum retinendum & conservandum; Non ut causae quae per se efficiant aut mereantur hanc conservationem: Sed ut media seu conditiones, sine quibus Deus non vult Justificationis gratiam in homi∣nibus conservare.] Vide probat. scq. Conclus. 7. p. 405. Bona opera Justificatorum sunt ad salutem necessaria necessitate ordinis, non causalitatis: Vel planius, ut via ordinata ad vitam aeternam, non ut causae meritoriae vitae aeternae. Vid. & pag. 570, 571, 572, 633.

You may see here, if you will be of Davenant's mind, you must be of mine in this: He gives to Works the very same Office as I do, neither more nor less. If he do give any more than I to Faith, (as he doth in calling it an Instrument; but I

Page 294

think it is Metaphorically only that he means) that is all the difference. I undertake to mani∣fest, that our greatest Divines ordinarily give to Works as much as I: But indeed I give not to Faith (and to man) so much as they; not daring to make man his own Justifier and Pardoner, or his Act to be the Instrument of God's Act of justi∣fying, or of producing the same effect. Who can forgive sins but God only? If he have any Instruments, it is his Gospel properly, and his Mi∣nisters remotely, and less properly.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.