Whether therefore doe they sinne which take away the cup from the Eucharisticall bread?
Yea, greatly: because they goe from the ordinance of Christ, and do otherwise preach the Gospel then he & his Apostles dida
2 Because it is a cursed deede to adde any thing to the testa∣ment of Christ, or to take away. Gal. 3, 15.
3 Because more fruit doth redound to the faithfull by both signes then by one: and two signes do signifie more fullie, & do more moue the minde then one: otherwise Christ had added a∣nother signe to no purpose.
4 Because Chrysostom saith. It is not with vs as in the old law, where some parts of the sacrifices were giuen to the priests, & some went to the offerers: but the same body of Christ & the same cup, is set forth to vs al.
5 Because it is lawfull for councills to determine nothing a∣gainst the worde of God.
6 Because although we be not bound to doe alwaies that which is commaunded (as when men cannot, for want of opor∣tunitie be partakers either of baptisme or the lords supper) yet when we doe it, we must not departe from the ordināce of God.
7 Because, seeing that we are so free from a multitude of Ce∣remonies that we haue a few, easie and plaine, it is an intollera∣ble thing, if we will not performe them without corruption.
8 Because the Pascall Lamb, Manna, and the sacrifices were not figures of the supper, but of Christ: And. 1. Cor. 10.3, 4. The Isra∣ralites are said, to eate the same spirituall meat, and to drinke the same spirituall drinke.
9 Because the keeping of the bread of the Lords supper was su∣perstitious, and could be done more easily then of wine.
10 Because the aduersaries themselues do grant that in old time bread was giuen into the hands, but that the cup was wont with the Deacons hand to be put to the mouth of the communi∣cants which would drinke of it in the Church: and at that which