far as we do for the Trinity. For our Reason is very weak; and all true Reason hath an anti-reason, and verity, a veri∣simility, always opposing it.
7. Taking heed also of using negative argumentations from former Authority against better: As, That if such a thing were a truth; or a truth of such consequence, It would have been mentioned by our Lord, the Apostles, the Fathers of such, and such times. As, if any, in the Apo∣stles times, should have argued, That the Mosaical Cere∣monies were not abrogated by Christ, because our Lord (who foresaw such a grand Controversy) yet in the Gospels hath expresly said nothing of nullifying them. Or again; That he had said nothing of them, because the Apostles quote not any such his commands. Or should have argued, That the Gentiles were not to be admitted into the Church, &c. because so many at Pentecost when inspired with the Holy Ghost, as yet knew nothing of it; Or, because afterward it (a matter of such consequence) was revealed to none of the rest; and discovered to Peter only by a Vision and an Experiment (See Acts 11.3.15. comp. Act. 10.28.34.) not by a clear command. Again, Not rejecting any thing as the Invention or Institution only of later times, from this negative arguing, That it cannot be shewed in the Writings, Histories, or Registers of the former; For many things may be believed or practised in such times when they are not mentioned in the Records thereof: Especially if those times less abound with Writings. Nor is every thing to be concluded new, that is newly spoken of, or agi∣tated. Which agitation first happens to be upon some new opposition made to things formerly received. Not using also Negative Argumentations from former times, to the disparaging or disswading any practice of the later on this account, such practice was not in former, or then was less frequent. For many such very beneficial for the aug∣menting of Piety or Devotion may be discovered, or also in∣stituted