Claworthy against Mitchel.
CLaworthy against Mitchel in a replevin, the Defendant avowed for a rent, and shewed that his father was seised, and let for years rendring rent, and he died, and that the reversion descended to him, and for rent behinde he avowed; in barre of which avowry the Plantiff said, that the father devised the reversion to another, and the other maintained his avowry, and traversed the devise; and it was found that the devise was only of two parties, and not of the third part, for in very truth, the land was holden by Knights service, and all this was found by special verdict, and for whom the jury had found was the question; and it was ar∣gued by Hendon, that this verdict is found for the avowant, and he vouched 32. H. 8. Brook issue 8. in a precipe quod reddat, if the issue be whether A. and B. infeoffed the Tenant, and it is found that A. infeoffed him, but not that A. and B. infeoffed him, the issue is found against the Tenant, see 14. E. 4. and Dyer 260. in debt upon a lease for years of divers parcels of land, and upon non demi∣sit pleaded, it is found quod demisit all except one parcel, this is found for the Plan∣tiff, and ••rin. 15. Iac. Rot. 2022. Allen against Soper in a replevin for a horse, and avowed for damage fesant, and the Defendant claimed Common for his beasts Levant and Couchant upon his land, and some in this case were found Levant and Couchant, and others not, and it was found against the Plantiff, and he said in this case, when the Defendant had alleadged a devise of all the land, and upon this issue is joyned, and it is found that part is devised and not all, this is found against the Plantiff, because the issue is joyned upon a particular and a spe∣cial point, whether all was devised or no, and yet he agreed that upon a general issue as in trespass in 20. acres of land, and the Defendant is found guilty but on∣ly in one, yet the Plantiff shall have judgement, but not where the issue is joyned upon a particular point as here, but admitting that the Plantiff shall have judge∣ment, yet the avowant shall have return for the third part; as in debt upon a lease for years, and it is found that he had not cause to demand all the rent, but that t••is ought to be apportioned, yet he shall have judgement for the residue, and so here: Ashley Serjeant to the contrary; the jury have found for the Plantiff, for the avowant had avowed for all, and he alleadged 26. Assise, where in an assise the seisin and the diseisin was found, and yet because there was no Tenant found of the Frank-tenement, the Plantiff shall have judgement, and as to that that had been said, that the avowant shall have retorn for part, he denied that, for now it appeared by the special verdict, that the avowant and the devisee are Tenants in