King against Bowen, Ent. Trin. Jac. Rot. 1755.
KIng againk Bowen entered Tr. 18. Iac. Rot. 1755. William King brought an action upon the case against Iohn Bowen for these slanderous words spoken of
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.
KIng againk Bowen entered Tr. 18. Iac. Rot. 1755. William King brought an action upon the case against Iohn Bowen for these slanderous words spoken of
him, King is a false foresworn knave and took a false oath against me at a commission at Witham, and the Defendant Iustified the words, and it was found for the Plan∣tiff, and Henden said, that it had been alleadged in arrest of Iudgement that the words are not actionable, and he said that he agreed if one say of another that he was foresworn in a Court which is not a Court of record, that none action will lye, because the party is not punishable for that in perjury, but in our case the commission issued out of the high Commission Court, which Court to the examina∣tion of witnesses is in nature of a temporal Court, and had been confirmed by act of Parliment: and Serjeant Harvey argued to the contrary, that the first words are not actionable, and then the subsequent words are uncertain, and yet if one say of another, that he was foresworn at the Common Pleas barre, the words are actionable, for it shall be intended that this was upon examination in the execution of Iustice: Hobert, if a man is foresworn in a Court Baron before the Steward, this is perjury, but in our case the words are altogether uncertain, for it doth not appear what authority the Commissioners had, nor yet in what manner he was forsworn; and Iustice Hutton said, if one man say of another he was foresworn before the Bishope of S. this is not actionable, but if one say of another, that he was forsworn before the Bishop of S. upon examination by him by vertue of a Commission issuing out of the Chancery, this is actionable, and Hutton agreed to the case of the Court Baron, & the same Law by him if that be in a Court Leete, but in the principal case Iudgement was arrested.