Page 34
A NIMADVERSION 2. Whether the general Councells of Ephesus and Chalcedon, as also the Prouincial of Afrik of 217. Bishops allowed as much to the Emperor and no more spiritual autho∣rity to the Pope, than the Oath of Supremacy doth?
BUT in the name of God Mr. Walsh, how com you to quote for the lawfull∣ness of the Eglish Oath of Supremacy, the general Councells of Ephesus, and Chaltedon, as also the Prouincial of Afrik, with S. Augustin? was not Nestorius and his heresy, as also that of Pelagius, condemn'd in that Councell of Ephesus by Pope Celestinus spiritual authority, residing in his Legat Cyrillus of Alexandria? Doth not S. Prosper say, that all the Eastern Churches were purg'd of two plagues by Celestinus, when the most glorious defender of the Catholik Faith Cyrillus Bishop of Alexandria was helpt by the Apostolik sword? Did the Emperor Theodosius the yonger, pretend to any spiritual iurisdiction, or authority in that Councel? He sent indeed his Domestik Candidia∣nus to it, not to act therin (as the Emperor himself writes to the Synod) but with an express caution and condition, that he should not haue any thing to do with mat∣ters of Faith; (because saith he) it is not lawfull for one that is not a Bishop, to intermedle in Ecclesiastical buisness, or con∣sultations. Why then was Candidianus sent by Theo∣dosius the Emperor? Mark well, Mr. Walsh, the rea∣son.