Thirdly, To a Meeting called the Second Days Morning-Meeting, for Li∣mitations he preicribes,
Countenancing, some Books, Particularly one from Pensilvania; called, A Modes•••• Account of the Principal Differences in Point. of Do∣ctrine, &c. which is chiefly, as I perceive by view thereof, a Col∣lection out of former Books of G. K's. &c.
And the other part of this Advertisement is, to give Account of the Cause to Intimate such a Meeting.
And one Cause assigned is, That he hath neither Time nor Abillity to Print Answers.
And another, That a Meeting of People have owned him in their Printed Testimony, called, A Seasonable Testimony; which therefore he accounts is Parallell'd with what the Quakers did some Years ago against Tho. Hicks.
And much of the other part being Invectives, and black Epithites, he brings forth and casts upon the said Persons.
All which I must need say falls greatly short, in my Opinion, of rendering the said G. K. a Person justly Meriting the Character of a Man of Learning and Distinction, or Wisdom, or Justice.
For had he been such an one, so much Folly, Pride and Con∣ceitedness would never have dropt from his Pen.
His, Folly 1st, In proposing a Meeting under the Restrictions and Li∣mitations he prescribes, without Throng or Croud, when he gives a Months publick notice in Print, of Time and Place, in this Populous City.
2dly, In desiring them to be there to hear themselves Charged, and Proved Guilty, of the following Things; when he hath al∣ready Charged them to be Guilty, and that in Publick Print, of Defamations, &c. and most Erronious and Hurtful Principles, to the great Shame and Scandal of the Christian Religion: But he pre∣tends a Justness, in desiring them to be there, to hear themselves proved Guilty; by which he shews he hath not yet been so Just, as now he would seem to be; but so far as his Charge will go to∣wards Proof, he is not wanting to do it, and that in Print, before such hearing
Would ever a Scholar, or Wise Man, manifest such Folly, thus to expose the said Persons, without hearing, or being justly desired to be present, to answer to their several Charges.
Is not this like Abbington Law, viz. Condemn first, and Try after; and contrary to the Wise Mans saying, viz. Blame not before thou hast examined the Matter; first understand, and then Rebuke; And below Felix his saying of Paul, I'll hear thee and thy Accusers when they come Face to Face?