day, but to morrow thereafter his Lordship calle it again, at the Side Bar; where my Lord Hercarse compeared again, in his former habit, and the dispute was renewed: in which dispute, our Advocates would propone nothing as to the Annualrents, aled∣ged due by the Infestments following upon the Heritable Bonds: Because an Action for such Annualrents, and an Action for Mails Deuties, are toto caelo different, 2dly, Because there was nothing in Libello: There being nothing in the Bill of Suspension, which was the ground of the Process, but Mails and Deuties: But knowing there could be nothing in this process for a ground of Mails and Du∣ties, which are the Emolument of the property, but the Apprising; This unanswerable Defence was proponed: Offers to prove the Ap∣prising Reduced, in foro contradictorio, quo ad Margaret Wardlaw, the Conjunct-fiar, and tho they were bound to say no further; Yet ex super abundanti, because what he proponed upon a Back-bond of Re∣version, seemed to savour much of Natural Equity: It was answer∣ed, primo, This Back bond was granted by a Wife, stante Matrimonio, and under Reduction, 2do: Finding there was much weight laid up∣on it, we offered under protestation that it should not be prejudicial to our Reduction, to Count and Reckon presently, without an Or∣der of Redemption; Albeit in Law without an Order, we were not tyed to Answer. To the first it was replyed, the Reduction is with∣out prejudice of Inchdarnies Authors real Right, which Inchdarnie produced to clear the same, which was true as to the matter, but most impertinent as an answer to the Defence produced: It was not contraverted but their real Rights were valid; but they could never be a ground for Mails and Duties in prima instantia; nor any other Right they produced but the Apprysing, which the Defence above∣mentioned, did totally elied. But my Lord Drumcairn being strait∣ned with the Defence, answered himself, that our Reduction was but as to personal Execution against Margaret Wardlaw. To which I replyed my self, my Lord, The peril of the cause upon that. And hear we desire the Judicious Reader to consider, whether the Or∣dinar who gave such an Answer, had purused the process, or if im∣plicita fide, he had followed my Lord Hercarse his Faith: seeing the very words of the Reduction are, Finds the first Reason of Reduction re∣livant, and proven, to so far as concerns the personal Obligdment, and all that has followed, or may follow thereupon as Null; And therefore, Reduces, Retreats,