Objection 1. It is Objected, Impetration is Uni∣versal, though the Application be not so, Christ ob∣tain'd for all, though it be not applied to all.
Answer 1. This Distinction cannot hold true in God, who grants nothing but what he bestows, for he cannot repent of his Grantings.
2. The End cannot be sever'd from the Action: if God will'd that Redemption might be obtain'd of him, it was, that it might be applied to some; and if to some and not to all, then there is some Disparity in the Impetration it self, and in the Intention of it, and not in the Applica∣tion only; and so the Distinction falls.
3. This Distinction hath no place in the pur∣pose of Christ, for therein they are both uni∣ted, Christ's aim being to bestow what he ob∣tains, he obtains nothing but what he applies, for doth he apply any thing which he did not obtain, Deus et Natura nil faciunt frustra.
4. It is absurd to say that Redemption is ob∣tained, when both he that obtains, and he of whom it is obtained, do know it shall never be applied; nor ever profit those for whom (they say) it is obtained.
5. It bespatters the unvaluable Price of the Blood of God, as if Christ should obtain Food for such as were never to be sed with it, and Freedom for those that were never to be freed