Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions.

About this Item

Title
Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions.
Author
Nisbet, John, Sir, 1609?-1687.
Publication
Edinburgh :: Printed by George Mosman ...,
1698.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Law -- Scotland.
Law reports, digests, etc. -- Scotland.
Cite this Item
"Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A52358.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 18, 2024.

Pages

D. 459. _____ _____ contra _____ _____ eod. die.

THE Defender, in a Spulʒie, having Alledged that the Goods were his own; and that, having given them to the Pursuer to be grassed, he might have taken away his own Goods: It was Replyed, That the Pur∣suer was not obliged to debate the Right and property of the said Goods; but in spolio, he needed Lybel no more, but that the Goods were upon his Ground and in his Possession; and taken away vi and in manner Lybel∣ed: And spoliatus ante omnia restituendus.

Page 223

The Lords debated among themselves, whether the Defence be Rele∣vant; and did not decide the case: Some being of Opinion, that if it should evidently appear, that the Pursuer was not in Possession of the Goods as suos, but in behalf of the Defender; as if there were a Writt betwixt the Pursuer and Defender, bearing that the Goods were the De∣fenders; and that the Pursuer contractu Locationis & Conductionis had tak∣en the same in graseing; that the Defender could not be Lyable for Spuil∣ʒie of his own Goods: But if it should appear, that there was any vio∣lence in taking them away, he may be pursued for a Riot.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.