Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions.

About this Item

Title
Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions.
Author
Nisbet, John, Sir, 1609?-1687.
Publication
Edinburgh :: Printed by George Mosman ...,
1698.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Law -- Scotland.
Law reports, digests, etc. -- Scotland.
Cite this Item
"Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A52358.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 22, 2024.

Pages

D. 443. Ker contra Kers. 25 January. 1677.

A Disposition being questioned, as being made in lecto, at least deliver∣ed then: It appeared by the Deposition of one of the Witnesses, used for proving the Lybel, that the said Write was subscribed diverse Years before the Disponer was on death-bed; and that the same was deli∣vered before death-bed to the said Witness: and that the Defunct having called for it on death-bed, for drawing two other Dispositions, of the Lands contained therein; one in favours of the Pursuer the Disponers Heir; and the other in favours of a Son of the Disponer, who was Father to the Person in whose favours the Disposition in question was made: And upon debate amongst the Lords, what should be the import of the said Te∣stimony, seing the Depositar did not declare in what Terms the same was given to him by the Disponer; whether to the behoof of the said Per∣son, in whose favours it was made or not; or upon any other account, for keeping the same, so that the Disponer might call for and alter it: It was Found, 1. That the Disponer might have revocked the same; In respect it did not appear, that it was delivered to the behoof of the Person to whom it was made.

This Decision seems to be hard; in respect the Disposition was now in the Hands of the Receiver, so that it was to be presumed, that it was de∣livered, either to him, or to the said other Person to his behoof: and the delivery ought to be construed, and presumed to have been, ut operetur: and the nature of the Act it self, imports that it should be to the behoof foresaid: It not being to be imagined, that if the Disponer had intend∣ed to have retained the Power in his Hands, either to make the said Right effectual, or not; he would have given it out off his Hands.

2. The Lords Found, Upon the Testimony foresaid, That the Dispo∣ner having revocked the said Disposition not simply, but to the effect fore∣said, that the said two Dispositions should be granted; The Pursuer there∣fore had not Right to the whole Lands, contained in the said first Dispo∣sition; but that the same should divide, conform to the said two Disposi∣tions. Mr. Thomas Hay Clerk. In praesentia.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.