Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions.

About this Item

Title
Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions.
Author
Nisbet, John, Sir, 1609?-1687.
Publication
Edinburgh :: Printed by George Mosman ...,
1698.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Law -- Scotland.
Law reports, digests, etc. -- Scotland.
Cite this Item
"Some doubts & questions, in the law, especially of Scotland as also, some decisions of the lords of Council and Sessions / collected & observed by Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton ... ; to which is added, an index, for finding the principal matters in the said decisions." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A52358.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 22, 2024.

Pages

D. 181. Bogie contra The Executors of the Lady Oxenford. 4. June 1674.

THE Executors of the Lady Oxenford, being pursued at the instance of a Legatar, did in the Compt before the Auditor, give in an Ar∣ticle of Discharge, viz. That the Expences of a Process at the Executors instance should be allowed: It was Answered, That if the Executor had not pursued that Process, there was as much free Gear as would have sa∣tisfied the Legacie, and the Executor had not prevailed: and if they had prevailed, the benefit would only have accresced to the Executor, and not to the Legatars: and therefore penes quem emolumentum, &c. and seing they would have had no benefite, they should have no loss by the event of that Process.

The Lords Found, That the Executors, having prosecuted a Process in∣tented by the Defunct, did their duty; and officium should not be da∣mnosum: and therefore the Charges of that Process should not be upon their own accompt, but should be defrayed out of the Executry: but so, that where Executors have no benefit by the Confirmation, but are either sim∣ple Executors, or universal Legators, as to the superplus, particular Lega∣cies being payed, if there be as much Executrie as will satisfie such Ex∣pences, and the Legacies; the Legacies ought to be payed intirely, be∣fore the Executors have any benefit; but if the Executrie will not amount to satisfy the Charges, and particular Legacies, the Charges are to be satisfy∣ed, and the Legacies to be abated proportionally, and the Executor is to have no benefit: but if he be a particular Legatar, he is to be considered with the rest of the Legatars, and to share with them proportionally. Mr. Thomas Hay Clerk. Concluded cause.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.