Luthers Alcoran being a treatise first written in French by the learned Cardinall Peron, of famous memory, against the Hugenots of France, and translated into English by N.N.P. : the page following sheweth the particular contents of the booke, which consisteth of symbolismes, parallells, identities.

About this Item

Title
Luthers Alcoran being a treatise first written in French by the learned Cardinall Peron, of famous memory, against the Hugenots of France, and translated into English by N.N.P. : the page following sheweth the particular contents of the booke, which consisteth of symbolismes, parallells, identities.
Author
Du Perron, Jacques Davy, 1556-1618.
Publication
[S.l. :: s.n.],
1642.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Huguenots -- France.
Christianity and other religions -- Islam.
Islam -- Relations -- Christianity.
Cite this Item
"Luthers Alcoran being a treatise first written in French by the learned Cardinall Peron, of famous memory, against the Hugenots of France, and translated into English by N.N.P. : the page following sheweth the particular contents of the booke, which consisteth of symbolismes, parallells, identities." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A36913.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 19, 2024.

Pages

Page 72

The 21. Symbolisme; That the Turkish, and Protestant Clorgy do marry. CHAP. XXI.

BVt let vs goe to other points, Who write of the Religion of the Turks, affirms, that the Turkish Priests do marry, & take wyues. For thus one of their Historians sayth: Sacerdotes(1) Tur∣cici habent xors, & vxori liberis, & familia va∣cant. The Turkith Priest haue wyues, and all their care and imployment, as about their wyfe, their Children, and family. Yea the Turks are so great enemyes to Virginity, as that the for∣mer(2) Historian, and others(3) thus re∣cord of Mahumet: Mahumetes multum vrget. ne quis maturâ atate eutra matrimonium degat: Mahumet much presseth, that not any of full and ripe ago, should liue out of the stace of Matri∣mony. Mahumet further teacheth (as ano∣ther Historian recordeth) That, Veluptate(4) corperis futarae faelicitati minime obsunt; The pleasures of the Bedy are 〈◊〉〈◊〉 hinderances to future felicity; whi•••• is included in the eight Azoa∣ra of the Al••••ran, touching multiplicity of wiues.

Well now my deare Countrimen of France. Is not all this good Hugentis••••••, or Prote∣tancy? Let vs examine the Particulars. And first touching Marying of Priests, or of Mini∣sters among those or that Reformed Religion; What Minister among them almost (& this

Page 73

soub••••le protexte, & vaile de la gloir d Die (vn∣der the recture (forsooth) of Gods glory) who is not matried? And how ready are they wrongfully to detor in defence of their Mariage those Words of the Apostle, Honorabile(5) Connubium in omnibu? A wife indeed is so inseparable a Character of our new Ministers, as that a Minister without a Woman, is but Halfe himselfe, and wanteth that which conduceth to the 〈◊〉〈◊〉. or per∣fect accomplishment of his function. So much doth the Flash dominere in these good men, who vaunt themselues to be All-spirit▪ who indeed liuing in flesh, do also liu af∣ter the flesh.

Now touching the aduancement of ma∣riage in all persons without exception, and depressing of Virginity with Mahumet, and Sergius, I is most strange to obserue, what the pens of your chiefe Professours haue left written. The first broaches of the vnsa∣very Vessell of your Religion, thus balan∣ceth Matrimony with Virginity saying: If we(6) weigh the Nature of Matrimony, and single 〈◊〉〈◊〉 vnmaried lyfe in themselues; Matrimony is 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Gould, and the spirituall state of single lyfe, as Dunge. To whome subscribeth Whitakerus, saying: Virginity(7) is not absolutly good, but on∣ly in some respect and manner. And hence it is, that the forsaid Luther more fully thus ex∣presseth himselfe He that(8) determineth to be without a Woman, let him lea•••• of the name of a man and become a plaine Angell, or spirit. A goa∣tish assertion!

Page 74

Concerning the other point aboue men∣tioned, where Mahumet decreed, that (if we will belieue the Alcoran) the Pleasures of the Body are no lets to future felicity; It is the very doctrine of Luther, inuested in other words, who ascribeth so much to Fayth, as that no corporall Pleasure (how vnlawfull soeuer) or any other sinne can preiudice a Mans Saluation. His words are these: Tam(9) diust est Christianus &c A Christian is so ith, as that though otherwise he would, notwith∣standing he cannot loose his Saluation, by any snne how great seeuer, except he will not belieue. And hereupon Luther further thus catechizeth his Schollers: No(10) worke is dirallowed of God, except the authour, and worker thereof be disallowed. With whom the fornamed Whi∣takers accordeth in these words, full of in∣cirement to sinnet Si(11) quis actum fidei, ba∣bet, i peccatae non nocent: Thus fortably to these mens Ghospell, no pleasure, or sinne (as Mahumet toucheth) can hinder mans fu∣ture Happines: Thus much of these formes Points: And of this last point more fully hereafter.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.