alterum et ••milem interfecerunt, quia Deut incen••∣prehensibilis & sap••ens eum ad se migrare fecit. The Iewes do offer blasphemy, and immoderate contumely to Mary, whiles they say they did put to death Christ her sonne being the Messenger of God; for him they killed not, but another like to him; for God being incomprehensible and wise, caused him to leaue the World, and remooue to him. From whence we infer, that since Christ (according to Mahumets doctrine) did not dye at all, that therefore in his iudgment, he dyed not for the Redemption of Mankind.
Luther, and his followers do (at least in words) grant that Christ did corporally dye. But they further teach, that his death of Body could not, nor did redeeme the World, ex∣cept his Diuinity had also suffered. Thus they: annexing this Impossibility of Christs suffe∣ring according to his Godhead (since true Diuinity is impassible.) And thus potentially they teach with Mahumet, that Christ did not redeeme the World; contrary to the Sen∣tence of Gods Vniuersall Church, maintay∣ning, that Christ, who had no sinne, became a Sacrifice for sinne. Now that Luther tea∣cheth, that Christ suffered (besides his Cor∣porall death) according to his diuinity, is euident out of Luthers owne words, which are these: Cum credo, quòd sola humana na∣tura prome passa est &c. When I do belieue, that only the Humane Nature suffered for me, Christ is a Sauiour of a vile and small account, and needeth also a Sauiour for himselfe: an execrable Blas∣phemy, since in Christ his Passion, through