that Mahumes and Sergius did hould certaine opinions, condemned for Heresyes by a∣thanasius Austin. Ierome, Gregory, and other an∣cient Orthodoxall Fathers. Thus the Alcoran de∣nieth the Trinity with Sabellius; It rea∣cheth with Arius, and Eunomias, that Christ was a mere Creature; With Carpocrates, and Nestorius, that Christ was not God, but only a holy and diuine Prophets with the Mani∣chees, that Christ was not crucified, & with the Donatists it denieth many Sacraments and the Church. Now the reason, why Melan∣cthon, Illyricus, & Bibliander, and others hould these opinions of the former men to be He∣resyes, is, in that they were condemned for Heresies by Athanasius, Austin, Ierome, Grego∣ry, and finally by the consent of the whole Primitiue Church of those dayes.
Here then I say, that it is an inexpugna∣ble Truth, that many Article of Fayth, be∣lieued at this day by Protestants, were in like fort condemned for explorate Heresies (& accordingly ranged in the Catalogue of Heresies) by the foresaid Fathers, I meane, Athanasius, Epiphanius, Austin, ••erome, Gregory, and other pious, and learned Fathers of those Ages. From hence then I irrepliably euict, that Mahumets Alcoran, and the new Gospellers do conspire and agree together in this point; to wit, that the Religion of Mahumes, and our Innouatours are engen∣dred and compounded of diuers ancient comdemned Heresies, though not altoge∣ther of the same Heresies. If then Mahume∣tisme,