Luthers Alcoran being a treatise first written in French by the learned Cardinall Peron, of famous memory, against the Hugenots of France, and translated into English by N.N.P. : the page following sheweth the particular contents of the booke, which consisteth of symbolismes, parallells, identities.

About this Item

Title
Luthers Alcoran being a treatise first written in French by the learned Cardinall Peron, of famous memory, against the Hugenots of France, and translated into English by N.N.P. : the page following sheweth the particular contents of the booke, which consisteth of symbolismes, parallells, identities.
Author
Du Perron, Jacques Davy, 1556-1618.
Publication
[S.l. :: s.n.],
1642.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Huguenots -- France.
Christianity and other religions -- Islam.
Islam -- Relations -- Christianity.
Cite this Item
"Luthers Alcoran being a treatise first written in French by the learned Cardinall Peron, of famous memory, against the Hugenots of France, and translated into English by N.N.P. : the page following sheweth the particular contents of the booke, which consisteth of symbolismes, parallells, identities." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A36913.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 17, 2024.

Pages

The 11. Symbolisme, That Mahumetisme and Lutheranisme are ingendred of ancient Heresyes. CHAP. XII.

TO passe further:(1) Melancthon, Illy∣ricus, Bibliander, and others affirme thus in expresse Words: Alcoranus ex veteribus Haeresibus consuitur: The Turkish Alcoran is wouen, or sewed toge∣ther of the Old Heresies. This these Prote∣stants did affirme, because they perceaued,

Page 49

that Mahumes and Sergius did hould certaine opinions, condemned for Heresyes by a∣thanasius Austin. Ierome, Gregory, and other an∣cient Orthodoxall Fathers. Thus the Alcoran de∣nieth the Trinity with(2) Sabellius; It rea∣cheth with Arius, and Eunomias, that Christ was a mere Creature; With Carpocrates, and Nestorius, that Christ was not God, but only a holy and diuine Prophets with the Mani∣chees, that Christ was not crucified, & with the Donatists it denieth many Sacraments and the Church. Now the reason, why Melan∣cthon, Illyricus, & Bibliander, and others hould these opinions of the former men to be He∣resyes, is, in that they were condemned for Heresies by Athanasius, Austin, Ierome, Grego∣ry, and finally by the consent of the whole Primitiue Church of those dayes.

Here then I say, that it is an inexpugna∣ble Truth, that many Article of Fayth, be∣lieued at this day by Protestants, were in like fort condemned for explorate Heresies (& accordingly ranged in the Catalogue of Heresies) by the foresaid Fathers, I meane, Athanasius, Epiphanius, Austin, erome, Gregory, and other pious, and learned Fathers of those Ages. From hence then I irrepliably euict, that Mahumets Alcoran, and the new Gospellers do conspire and agree together in this point; to wit, that the Religion of Mahumes, and our Innouatours are engen∣dred and compounded of diuers ancient comdemned Heresies, though not altoge∣ther of the same Heresies. If then Mahume∣tisme,

Page 50

and Lutheranisme do agree in this one Commons point, must not their affinity & assotiation be great, since that saying is true: Quae conueniunt in vno tertio, conueniunt in∣crse? I meane, that they do agree in this par∣ticular thing, though in some other points different; for I grant▪ that two faces may be a like to a third face, yet dislike in seuerall proportions in themselues.

But now to proue, that diuers Positions maintained by Luther, Swinglius, Caluin, Beza, and other Sectaries of this Age, were ana∣thematized by the former ancient and lear∣ned Fathers, is so easily accomplished; as that seing the proofe thereof ought to pre∣uaile much with any Man, not blinded with Preiudice; I haue therefore seposed a short Appendix, annexed to this Treatise for the demōstrating of the same; In the which the Reader▪ shall find the former ancient Fathers, and others of the same tymes, to be most luxuriant (as I may say) and riotous in condemning many (yea very many) points of Lutheranisme, for most hatefull, & execrable Heresyes.

And thus as this Treatise (as I expressed in the beginning) is the Glasse, wherein you Hugenots of France may behould diuers of your impious Opinions, conspiring alto∣gether with the fayth of the Mahumetans, Sa∣racens, and Turks, so this subsequent Appen∣dix I may well terme your Second Glasse (as I haue intimated elswhere) which will exhi∣bite to you the face of the ancient Here∣syes,

Page 51

condemned by the Church of God for such, and yet the same Heresies are now en∣tertayned, and belieued by you of the refor∣med Religion. Thus I will furnish you with a double Glasse to see your blemishes the rein. I cannot say with the wise Man, that it is Speculum(3) sine macula, seing it is fraught with deformities, partly of the Turks, and partly of the Old Heretiks; all which said scarrs, and sedities do remaine at this day v∣pon the face of your New presumed Ghospell.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.