An abridgement of the Lord Coke's commentary on Littleton collected by an unknown author; yet by a late edition pretended to be Sir Humphrey Davenport, Kt. And in this second impression purged from very many gross errors committed in the said former edition. With a table of the most remarkable things therein.

About this Item

Title
An abridgement of the Lord Coke's commentary on Littleton collected by an unknown author; yet by a late edition pretended to be Sir Humphrey Davenport, Kt. And in this second impression purged from very many gross errors committed in the said former edition. With a table of the most remarkable things therein.
Author
Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634.
Publication
London :: printed for W. Lee, D. Pakeman, and G. Bedell,
1651.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Littleton, Thomas, -- Sir, -- d. 1481 -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"An abridgement of the Lord Coke's commentary on Littleton collected by an unknown author; yet by a late edition pretended to be Sir Humphrey Davenport, Kt. And in this second impression purged from very many gross errors committed in the said former edition. With a table of the most remarkable things therein." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A33621.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 5, 2024.

Pages

Sect. 437.

Si tel que est en prison soit utlage en action de debt ou trespass, ou en apucal de Robbery, il reveria tiel utlage, per beve de error.

Outlawries may be reversed, either by plea, or by writ of error. By plea when the defendant commeth in upon the Caput utlagati. &c. he may by plea reverse the same for matters apparent, as in respect of a supersedeas omission of processe, varience, or other matter apparent in the Record, and yet in these cases some hold, that in another term the defendant is driven to his writ of error. 2 E 4. 1, 4 E 4. 10. a 1 E 4. 73, 11 H 7. 5, 21 H 6. 50, 9 H 4, 3. El. Dy. 192. 2 El. 176. 37. H 6. 19.

But for any matters in fact, as death, imprisonment, service of the King, &c. he is driven to his writ of error, unlesse it be in case of felony, and there in favorem vitae, he may plead it, But albeit imprisonment be a good cause to reverse an

Page 276

outlawry, yet it must be by processe of Law in invitum, and not by consent or covin; for such imprisonment shall not a∣void the outlawry, because upon the matter it is his own act. 8. H 4. 7, 21 H 7. 13, 39 H 6. 1, H 7. 1. 1 E 4. 2, 27 H 8. 2, 38. Ass. p. 17. V S. 439.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.