Page 16
1. §. As if any one should recite the Significati∣ons of these Latin Words, Jus, Canis, Malum, &c. or distinguish in this Oration, Aio te Aeacide Roma∣nos vincere posse. That is, I say, you Aeacides can conquer the Romans. This properly indeed is not so much Division as Enunci••••••••••, and is more frequently call'd Distinction than Division.
Ax. 3. And is to be adhibited in the Beginning of a Disputation
1. §. So that the Disputation may seem to be insti∣tuted against the Thing, not Words: For it may happen, says Aristotle, that the Answerer may not direct his Thoughts the same way with him that interrogates, when any thing is ambiguous in a Speech, Book 1. Top. Cap. 8.
Ax. 4. Now Division of the Thing which is pro∣perly said to Be a Division, is an Explication of the Whole by its Parts.
Ax. 5. And is either by its self, or by Accident.
Ax. 6. Division by it self, is that by which is divi∣ded a Whole into its Parts, which are in it, of, or by themselves.
Ax. 7. Accident by Accident.
1. §. For Example; when Animal is divided into Man and Beast, or into Body and Soul, the Division is a Division by it self; because Man and Beast are by themselves contained under Animal; and Animal is of it self composed of Body and Mind. But when Men are divided into Freemen and Slaves, good and bad, the Division is by Accident; because here, not Men of themselves are divided, but the States and Conditi∣ons of Men or other Accidents which happen to them.
Ax. 8. Division of it self again is Four-fold; One of the Universal Whole, or Genus into Species's; An∣other of the Formal, or defin'd into its Parts defining, as Genus and Difference; Another of the Essential