Page 13
II. Their Position and Doctrine, That the Bishops of Rome do succeed St. Peter in such a Supreme Power and Authority, and are now the Head of all the Chri∣stian Church, is not consistent with the sacred Scriptures, but directly contrary to them.
This is proved by what hath been said already: For if St. Peter had no such Universal Power and Authority over the Apostles and all the Church (as it is clear that he had not) then the Roman Bishops have no ground to pretend to succeed him in such a supreme Power and Authority. This is altogether vain, seeing there is no truth in the former. And there is no proof at all that they should be St. Peter's Heirs and Successors, and be the only Masters of that Power and Au∣thority which he had in the Church. And how then can they assume such an Universal Power and Authority which he had not? Heb. 5.4. And no man taketh this honour unto himself (saith the Apostle) but he that is called of God, as was Aaron. And how then can the Bi∣shops of Rome justly assume to themselves such a supreme and univer∣sal Power over all the Church, till they can shew some Divine Com∣mission for it? And for such Authority they have no Plea nor Co∣lour from the sacred Word of God. There is no clear place in the sacred Scriptures to prove that ever St. Peter was at Rome; and he wrote no Epistle to them, to confer any Power upon them; and in those Epistles that he wrote, he makes no mention of any such Power and supreme Authority that they were to have. St. Peter was chiefly the Apostle of the Jews, as St. Paul sheweth; Gal. 2.7. And how then can the Roman Gentiles pretend that all his Power is devolved upon them? St. Peter was much at Jerusalem, and the Bishops of that place might have had a better Title to be his Successors in a higher manner than others, if any were to have been so, than the Bishops of Rome can have; because he was chiefly and primarily the Apo∣stle of the Jews. St. Peter was also at Antioch some time; Gal. 2.11. And the Bishops of that place may alledg as good a Plea to be his Successors, as the Bishops of Rome can. Again, St. Paul writes an Epi∣stle to the Romans, and several Epistles from Rome; but no intimation in them that the Bishops of that place only were to be St. Peters Suc∣cessors and to have an universal Power and Authority over the whole Church. And from hence we may see that St. Paul knew nothing of any