36. Did that Quaker sin therein or not, who brought lately, on the Lords-day, an old Dublet into Dr. Gells Church in Lon∣don, and sate upon the Communion Table mending it, while the Dr. was preaching, the Parishioners forbidding him.
37. If the Saints need not be taught by men, (as you say) is it not needless for you to teach one onother?
38. Do you think it a Tenants dutie to pay rent to his Land∣lord?
39. Whereas there is some talke by some Quakers of divi∣ding mens estates, and having all things common, do you believe that it is lawfull and fitting so to do?
40. Do you not think that the Clergy have as much to shew for taking tythes, as any man in England hath for taking rent for land left him by his Ancestours?
41. Do you not think it as lawfull to bereave all men of the one as of the other?
42. Do you think in good earnest that 'tis lawfull for Wo∣men to preach in the Church, as you asserted publickly last week? And that St. Pauls prohibition concerns onely married women not Virgins, and Widowes if you think so, then I ask further, why you may not say as well, that the seaventh Com∣mandment concerns Virgins and Widowes onely, and not married women.
43. When you tell us that you have faith in Christ, do you mean Christ whose person is now ascended into heaven above the Clouds or do you mean onely a Christ within you?
44. Did not Edward Burrough, James Naylor, and others affirm, that he who expects to be saved by that Jesus Christ who died at Jerusalem, shall be deceived? See their two Books, and the brief relation of the Northern Quakers, p. 22. &c. Billing-slyes defence of Scriptures, p. 16. The perfect Pharisee, p. 8. and Farmers mystery of godliness.
45. Do not you George Whitehead blasphemously take to your self an attribute of God, while you pretend ordinarily to know