Page 1
An Answer to a printed Pamphlet called the Case of the Inhabitants of Croydon in the County of Surrey, Humbly offered to the Parliaments Judicious Considera∣tion.
TO all unconcern'd persons who have known the people of Croydon, and time out of mind their un-Christian dealing with the Reverend Dr. Bernard (the last legall Incumbent, whom they Sequestred,) and all the rest of their Ministers, it might Suffice to say, their Uncharitable and inhumane Pamphlet is a Libel, but supposing it may be perus'd by Straingers, In generall it will seeme incre∣dible to any Considerate man, that if he had beene guilty of those Crimes they pretend, being all or most part alledg'd to be done by him above Ten Years since, that they had not (while in memory) convicted him of one of them, ha∣ving many years vs'd all means that Violent and Unreasonable men for their re∣verige, could possibly invent.
And though he can patiently beare the malice of those who neither frequent Church or Sacraments, And who in several other Courts if their Oaths had been regarded, and by the mercy of God he had not falsified, would long since have ruin'd him. Yet for the Satisfaction of his Friends and impartiall Persons who desire to be further undeceived, its answered, That Mr. Whitford was by some of the late Powers sequestred from his Living, And one Mr. Seymor by his Consent put into the same, who by the Consent of the said Mr. Whitford re∣signed it to Dr. Clewer and by agreement the Dr. did allow him 20 l. per Ann. though by the rules of the then Powers he was not lyable to pay any thing in regard he had a Temporal Estate▪ and no Child, and the living was worth but about 80 l. per Annum.
As to the Allegations relating to Mr. Preston, the Dr. found him there, and did never refine him for his Curate, but the said Mr. Preston (taking advantage of his absence) did of his own accord then officiate as Curate, but the Major of Northampton adjudged him to be of a Scandelous life, and convicted him of Drun∣keness for which he paid his Fine, and the Dr. being threatned to be Sequestered if he employed him, did forbid him, But contrary thereunto there being a Chap∣pel of ease belonging to the Church: He did Voluntarily officiate there, And after Commenced severall suites against the Dr. under Colour of Wages; But the Dr. was never Plantive against him in any Suite▪ nor prosecuted him for reading Common Prayer, The Dr. in those times so far as it was safe for him frequently using the forme thereof, in Baptisms and otherwise, particularly Mr. Howe a Ministers Child of Chessamboys in the County of Bucks, Sir Tobee Terryl, and Mr. King being Godfathers.