Commentaries of the diuine Iohn Caluine, vpon the prophet Daniell, translated into Englishe, especially for the vse of the family of the ryght honorable Earle of Huntingdon, to set forth as in a glasse, how one may profitably read the Scriptures, by consideryng the text, meditatyng the sense therof, and by prayer

About this Item

Title
Commentaries of the diuine Iohn Caluine, vpon the prophet Daniell, translated into Englishe, especially for the vse of the family of the ryght honorable Earle of Huntingdon, to set forth as in a glasse, how one may profitably read the Scriptures, by consideryng the text, meditatyng the sense therof, and by prayer
Author
Calvin, Jean, 1509-1564.
Publication
At London :: Imprinted by Iohn Daye, ouer Aldersgate,
1570. Cum gratia & priuilegio Regiæ Maiestatis.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Bible. -- O.T. -- Daniel -- Commentaries.
Cite this Item
"Commentaries of the diuine Iohn Caluine, vpon the prophet Daniell, translated into Englishe, especially for the vse of the family of the ryght honorable Earle of Huntingdon, to set forth as in a glasse, how one may profitably read the Scriptures, by consideryng the text, meditatyng the sense therof, and by prayer." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A17641.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 6, 2024.

Pages

The meditation.

WHere Daniell saith that Nebuchadnezer had this dreame the second yeare of his Empire, it semeth somthing contrary to the first Chapiter. For if Nebuchadnezer did conquer Ierusalem the first yeare of his kingdome, how can it be that Daniell was now counted amonges the wyse men and Astrologians, for he was then a Scholer? This seemeth not then to agree, that Daniell with his companions were but Scholers the first yeare of Nebuchadnezer, and that the second yeare he was in daunger of hys lyfe because he was of the num∣ber of the Mages. Some say that the second yeare is to be

Page [unnumbered]

counted from the captiuity and destruction of the Citie: for they say that Nebuchadnezer was called kyng after that he had a quiet Monarchy, and before he had destroyed the Temple and Citie he had not so. But I do thinke other∣wayes, as it is more probable, that this Nebuchadnezer raygned wyth hys father when he conquered Ierusalem in the tyme Ioachim, and that he was then sent thether by hys father: and after he had ended hys warres in Aegipt, he returned into Chaldea, to preuent seditions and inno∣uations. Wherefore herein there is no absurdity, that Nebuchadnezer raigned before the death of hys father to∣gether wyth hym, and afterward he raigned alone: and that this thyng which is here spoken, came to passe in the second yeare of his owne raigne. He sayth that he dreamed dreames, and yet there is but one dreame declared. But because many thynges were wrapped vp in thys dreame, he speaketh plurally as of many.

It is added that his spirit was troubled, that we may know that it was no common dreame. For this was not the first tyme that euer he dreamed, neither was he so trou∣bled euery night to call together all the Mages. Wherefore Daniell woulde note that thys was an extraordinary dreame, so that he beyng astonished did fall agayne into a dreame, & through the trouble of his mynde, forgat what he had dreamed. But he felt a burning in his cōscience because God would not suffer hym to rest, but would haue hys mynde to be vnquiet whiles that he should haue the inter∣pretation of the dreame. Wherefore the prophane writers do not without cause place dreames amonges diuinations. They speake in déede doubtfully of dreames, because there can be no certainty in their writinges: yet did they thinke that there was some kinde of diuination in their dreames. How be it to extend this to all dreames were foolishe and childish. For many tymes dreames do come of the affection of the mynde, or of the disposition of the body: but of the cō∣trary part, some dreames do come by Gods appointment for other purposes.

Page 8

But concerning the dreame of Nebuchadnezer, two thynges are to be noted: First that the memory therof was lost and it was forgotten: secondly that the meaning there∣of was vnknowen. We may sée in other places that the dreame was not forgotten, and yet that the interpretation was vnknowen. But here Nabuchadnezer was not on∣ly troubled for want of interpretation of the dreame, but he was troubled agayne and was full of care and griefe be∣cause the vision was vanished forth of hys mynde. As for the darknes of the dreames, God vseth them so towardes his owne children. For Ioseph when he dreamed that he was worshipped of the Sunne and the Moone, knew not what the matter ment: neither yet when he dreamed that his sheafe was worshipped of the sheaues of his brethren, but he tolde it simply to his brethrē. Thus doth God speake in dreames as it were by a darke ridle, vntill the interpre∣tation be annexed: and so was the dreame of Nebuchad∣nezer.

Thus sometimes we sée yt God doth open his wil to the vnbeleuers, but not openly, because they seyng should not sée: and it is as if one should reach vnto them a booke that were shut (as Isay sayth) that God doth speake with the vnbeleuers in a straunge and a stamering toung. So then was Gods will vttered to Nebuchadnezer, that he did still remaine doubtfull and amazed: wherefore hys dreame could nothing haue profited hym, vnlesse God had geuen hym Daniell to be the interpreter thereof. All hys cunning Astrologians and Chaldees could do nothing: as all theyr sciences are vayne and foolish. The Chaldeans who had ta∣ken to them the name of the Countrey as men most excel∣lent, could tell the king nothing at all. Daniell and his fel∣lowes in the meane tyme are forgotten of the king, though he had good proofe of their wisdome before (no doubt) by ye singular prouidence of God: because God would not haue his seruauntes to be ioyned or coupled wyth the Enchan∣ters, Sorcerers, and Mages, but would haue his power to be made euident in Daniell, after that all their vayne

Page [unnumbered]

sciences had fayled, and that the kyng by them could haue no comfort, though they boasted much of their owne know∣ledge. But it is to be noted that the dreames that God sen∣deth can not be expounded by any arte of man, but by speci∣all reuelation from the almighty God.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.