be imagined (saith Bellarmine) why vpon Peters an∣swere of his singular loue aboue the rest, Christ should singularly say to him Pasce oues meas, if he gaue him not something aboue the rest.
To which, we say, the Fathers shew another cause or reason: Peter had denied Christ more then the rest, and being forgiuen, was to loue more then the rest, (Luk. 7.43.47.) and therefore Christ vrged him singu∣larly, by thrice asking (Louest thou mee?) answerable to his three denials, to performe the office enioyned in generall to all the Apostles. So saith Cyril, Because he denyed him thrice at his Passion, therefore there is a threefold confession of loue required of him: and so the glosse: and Saint Augustine saith, A threefold con∣fession answereth to a threefold negation, that the tongue may expresse as much in loue, as it did in feare. And so in very truth, Christs words were rather a stay of Peters weakenesse, then a marke of his worthinesse, or a proofe of his supremacy.
Thus we haue the onely place of Scripture (where∣upon Bellarmine insisteth) of performance and bestow∣ing supremacy particularly vpon Peter: and that not a plaine and euident place of Scripture, or by deduction of euident reason (such as necessary points of diuinity should haue,) but onely their owne infirme, and vn∣sound interpretation: a poore and weake ground of so great a building. The transcendent supremacy of the Pope of Rome ouer the whole Church of Christ, and the many Doctrines and practises that depend thereup∣on, haue no other ground in Scripture but this, their owne conceited and forced interpretation of this place, [Peter louest thou mee more then these? Feed my sheepe:] that is, Take thou authority more then these, to make thy successors aboue all theirs, heads of the vniuersall Church, with such power, as themselues shall list to take or exercise.
Antiq. I cannot but ingenuously confesse this infe¦rence