The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright.

About this Item

Title
The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright.
Author
Wright, Henry, fl. 1616.
Publication
London :: Printed by Nicholas Okes,
1616.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Political science -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15753.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15753.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 2, 2024.

Pages

2

It may further be demanded, wherefore they who haue c 1.1 best deserued of a Common-wealth are (of∣tentimes) worst recompenced and requited?

IS this the reason, for that d 1.2 there is nothing lesse lasting then the very name of a Benefite? Or is this rather the cause, for that it is c 1.3 appropriate and peculiar to certaine Common-wealths, so to enuy those which excell in vertue and goodnesse, as they themselues being not able to follow and imitate them therein, seeke to spoile them of their gouernement and Empire? Or may this rather be the reason, that some f 1.4 standing too much vpon their owne merites, haue borne themselues too proudly against tje State, or their owne society? Or might this likewise bee the cause, for that those, who either by their rare exploits, or cun∣ning ambition, creepe into the fauour of the peo∣ple at home, and hunt after renowne and admira∣tion abroad, may seeme to dimme the glory of their Princes, who greatly desire to be accounted well-deseruing of their owne people, as those to whom it more properly belongeth, and therefore they must needs oppose such, and grow in distaste of them? Or is it for that all men generally by their owne corrupt nature, are lesse prone, prompt, and ready to requite a good turne, then to reuenge an iniury? Or may this rather bee the

Page 52

reason for that the Prince, or g 1.5 State, groweth in∣to suspicion of such kinde of men, least they should affect innouation, or seeke to tyrannise?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.