The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright.

About this Item

Title
The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright.
Author
Wright, Henry, fl. 1616.
Publication
London :: Printed by Nicholas Okes,
1616.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Political science -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The first part of the disquisition of truth, concerning political affaires Handled in two seuerall sections. The first whereof (by way of certaine questions probleme-wise propounded and answered) consisteth of foureteene chapters. Written by Henry Wright." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15753.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 7, 2024.

Pages

1

It may bee demanded when Benefites are to bee be∣stowed vpon a man?

ARE they to bee collated vpon him a iust at that time, when the bestower of them is com∣pelled so to doe, as needing the present help of such a man, or for some priuate end to himselfe best knowne? But this manner of giuing should seeme to be very extrauagant, and distastefull, to the receiuer, as thinking that they were collated vpon him by reason of the parties necessity, which once serued, he would neuer conferre more vpon him. Or are they not so to bee collated vpon any man, but b timously rather, before hee which may

Page 51

haue need of them, shall haue occasion to vse them, or the Collator thereof the person?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.