THE ANSWERE.
NAy ask whether any of them do stand firme, and remaine sound and liue conformable to the first institution of their order or no, conside∣ring that euen those who otherwise are of good disposition, and haue ma∣ny signes of grace in them: yet being but of shallow wits, simple conceits, & meane iudgement for casting of plots or statizing, they must silly soules be imployed as practitioners in another kind, to wit, to win affections vnto them, and admiration to be had of them, either by a vowed silence, Quia stultus si tacuerit pro sapiente reputabitur: or else by rules giuen them, what they may speake, and not passe those limits assigned them: or other∣wise to employ themselues as they find euery one fittest and best agree∣ing to feede humorists with phantasticall conceits. Which points if any either make scruple of, yea or thinke it not meritorious for obedience sake, or otherwise, do not manage it hansomely, he is sure to be thrust out for a reprobate, or some euill end to come to him one way or other.
But now for heretikes and Apostataes, I haue said enough in the former Quodlibets, that there are many of them fallen alreadie out of Gods church without euer returne againe, and so they do daily, and question∣lesse so they will do still: there being no more certaintie nor assurance of their stand then of any other, either secular, or religious person, nor in very deed so much (as they now liue) because they haue made religion, but an art of such as liue by their wits, and (as I said before) a very hotch potch of omnium githerum, religious secular, cleargicall, laicall, ecclesiastical, monasti∣call, spirituall, temporall, martiall, ciuill, oeconomicall, politicall, liberall, mecha∣nicall, municipiall, irregular, and all without order. And howsoeuer they brag, band and boast of their familiaritie with God, their rare and special indowments for guiding and gouernement of soules more then secular Priests haue (whom Catholickes are admonished to take heed of, and be∣ware of all Priests in generall, that are not either Iesuites or guided by Ie∣suites in all things) their high contempt of Priesthood, their fanaticall dreams of extraordinary inspirations, insufflations, illuminations (or terme them incantations, or what you list, for all is starke nought) yet will they neuer or hardly be able to recouer that credite they haue lost through∣out all Christendome by these arrogant vaunts of their holinesse.
And as for the last point, whether any of them haue returned againe into Gods Church after their lapse or no: another question might be made whether they haue not brewed a new heresie in a greene fustie vessell, or broched an old, raised vp ab orco out of a rotten stinking